Teams

SKY BLUE

2026 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-04vs HRCA-N PINKLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda Weiss / Claire Margolf vs Andrea Pickett / Rebecca Robbins2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesCandace Kristensson vs Sarah Hays6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKathleen Newman / Cynthia Frandsen vs Leslie Prusse / Debbie Easton2-6, 0-6
2026-07-28vs CHCC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Hoskins / Claire Margolf vs Alyssa Mischell / Megan Lutz0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesCandace Kristensson vs Caroline Crawford6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCynthia Frandsen / Sarah Haigney vs Darcy Levy / Christine Loeffler1-6, 0-6
2026-07-21vs GAC NAVYLost 12
W#1 DoublesClaire Margolf / Amanda Weiss vs Melissa Brunkow / Mary Livadas7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSarah Haigney vs Leah Putnam4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Hoskins / Danielle Gooden vs Brooke Weiland / Jessica Foster4-6, 2-6
2026-07-14vs CPCC GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichelle Hoskins / Kathleen Newman vs Heather Hagen / Sarah Zelazek0-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesAmanda Weiss vs Brittany Grimm4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCynthia Frandsen / Danielle Gooden vs Sheila Margossian / Jenny Wiebers6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-07-07vs PRKR REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmily Hoagland / Claire Margolf vs Maya MacAron / Laura Davidson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMichelle Hoskins vs Lindsey Seidl6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDanielle Gooden / Kathleen Newman vs Christine Avery / Roxanne Corbett1-6
2026-06-30vs HRCA-N PINKLost 03
L#1 DoublesEmily Hoagland / Claire Margolf vs Tosha MacK / Leslie Prusse2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAmanda Weiss vs Sarah Hays4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKathleen Newman / Cynthia Frandsen vs Bryn Stucki / Kerri Christensen1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-23vs CHCC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichelle Hoskins / Amanda Weiss vs Lisa Friar / Alyssa Mischell1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesEmily Hoagland vs Christine Loeffler1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Haigney / Danielle Gooden vs Zoe Williams / Ali Bolling2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.08 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.34
Cynthia Frandsen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.33
Emily Hoagland
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.27
Michelle Hoskins
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Candace Kristensson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.09
Amanda Weiss
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 2.5
2.08
Sarah Haigney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
1.89
Danielle Gooden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.84
Claire Margolf
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.78
Kathleen Newman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Hoskins + Emily Hoagland213 matchesnot enough data
Claire Margolf + Sarah Haigney033 matchesnot enough data
Claire Margolf + Amanda Weiss123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Cynthia Frandsen
40W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.34
Emily Hoagland
13W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
Michelle Hoskins
12W–39L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Candace Kristensson
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Amanda Weiss
7W–13L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Sarah Haigney
6W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
2.5
Danielle Gooden
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.89
2.5
Claire Margolf
4W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.84
Kathleen Newman
2W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.