Teams

GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+M(Lopez)(EPTC#1)

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPhillip Cortez / Terry Cheney vs Daniel Martinez / Arvind Singhal3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-02-02Won 10
W#2 DoublesPhillip Cortez / Omar Cervantes-Lopez vs Micah Harrison / Blake Anderson6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 2025 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Harrison/Adult 40 & over/3.5M71211125268
2GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+M(Melendez)(EPTC#2)62201229258
3GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+M(Burns)(FB)62191331288
4GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+M(Acevedo)(CCC)34141432266
5GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+M(Lopez)(EPTC#1)2591940293
6GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+M(Michnovicz)(Lions)26122045320
7GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+M(Tepsick)(TW)17131944320
8GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+M(Roldan)(EPCC#2)000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
James Lambeth
usually #2 Doubles 49%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.72
Daniel Avila
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
James McCleland
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3
Fred Castro
published
Jesus Monarrez
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 19% · published
Omar Cervantes-Lopez
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Singles 23% · published
Omar Lopez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
Phillip Cortez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Richard Ramos
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Steven King
published
Terry Cheney
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Lambeth + James McCleland2443% gamesnot enough data
Richard Ramos + Omar Lopez033 matchesnot enough data
Richard Ramos + Omar Cervantes-Lopez213 matchesnot enough data
Fred Castro + Omar Cervantes-Lopez123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
James Lambeth
108W–107L career · 45 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Daniel Avila
14W–43L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.72
3
James McCleland
80W–75L career · 27 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
Fred Castro
4W–22L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jesus Monarrez
30W–35L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Omar Cervantes-Lopez
40W–55L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Omar Lopez
10W–54L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Phillip Cortez
31W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Ramos
25W–43L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steven King
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Terry Cheney
23W–21L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.