Teams

BOUS:KMA:Kellogg

2024 WMA Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed 1

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesYong Shin / Linda Tvrdy vs John Garde / Sara Sherry6-4, 3-6, 2-1
W#2 DoublesJoy Greenleaf / Jeb Rong vs David Zaccheo / Grace Calcano6-3, 7-5
2024-06-09vs ETC: Net Nuts:LaPierreLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarcia Disbrow / Tom Russo vs Marc LaPierre / ALYCE STILES3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Boisvert / Julia Leedham Rindfuss vs Justin Crawford / Mika Inoue6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBrian Kellogg / Liv Cummins vs Armand Wray / Elaine Grocott6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesJulia Leedham Rindfuss / John Boisvert vs John Garde / Sara Sherry7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesYong Shin / Linda Tvrdy vs David Kaufman / Grace Calcano6-0, 6-1
2024-05-04vs ETC: Net Nuts:LaPierreWon 21
L#1 DoublesTom Russo / Marcia Disbrow vs ALYCE STILES / Marc LaPierre1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesScott Laprade / Joy Greenleaf vs Justin Crawford / Mika Inoue6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJohn Boisvert / Julia Leedham Rindfuss vs Scott Schneider / Martha Gagnon6-3, 6-3
W#1 DoublesTom Russo / Marcia Disbrow vs Sarah la Cour / Niels la Cour6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesYong Shin / Linda Tvrdy vs Bonnie Allen / John Garde3-4
W#3 DoublesJohn Boisvert / Julia Leedham Rindfuss vs Jacob Greenburg / Toni Wall6-2, 6-1
2024-04-07vs ETC: Net Nuts:LaPierreWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrian Kellogg / Liv Cummins vs Justin Crawford / Mika Inoue7-5, 2-6, 2-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Boisvert / Julia Leedham Rindfuss vs David Pickett / Elaine Grocott6-0, 6-7, 2-0
W#1 DoublesScott Laprade / Cheryl Kellogg vs Bonnie Allen / David Zaccheo6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTom Russo / Marcia Disbrow vs Grace Calcano / Jacob Greenburg6-2, 6-1
2024-02-24vs ETC: Net Nuts:LaPierreLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarcia Disbrow / Tom Russo vs Marc LaPierre / ALYCE STILES4-6, 7-6, 1-2
L#2 DoublesYong Shin / Linda Tvrdy vs Martha Gagnon / David Pickett4-6, 6-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 6.0 Mixed 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BOUS:KMA:Kellogg6218615152
2ETC: Net Nuts:LaPierre6218615163
3ETC: Full Court Press 40: Levine/Smith0802448297

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.76
Brian Kellogg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.76
Cheryl Kellogg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Julia Leedham Rindfuss
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Jeb Rong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
John Boisvert
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Joy Greenleaf
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Tvrdy
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Liv Cummins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Marcia Disbrow
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Scott Laprade
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Tom Russo
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Yong Shin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Kellogg + Liv Cummins211058% gamesnot enough data
Joy Greenleaf + Tom Russo161057% gamesnot enough data
Julia Leedham Rindfuss + John Boisvert15657% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl Kellogg + Scott Laprade14267% gamesnot enough data
Marcia Disbrow + Tom Russo3551% gamesnot enough data
Yong Shin + Linda Tvrdy5254% gamesnot enough data
Joy Greenleaf + Jeb Rong404 matchesnot enough data
Cheryl Kellogg + Tom Russo213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brian Kellogg
26W–12L career · type M · 2 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Cheryl Kellogg
39W–20L career · type S · 1 line in 2024
3%93%4%
2.76
Julia Leedham Rindfuss
37W–49L career · 5 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.71
Jeb Rong
13W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
John Boisvert
15W–6L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Joy Greenleaf
26W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Linda Tvrdy
17W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Liv Cummins
28W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Marcia Disbrow
26W–56L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott Laprade
32W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tom Russo
23W–16L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Yong Shin
5W–2L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.