Teams

CMiles (Queens)

2023 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 6.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-10-04vs AChristie (PPRSC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCaitlin Steele / Chivonne Hunter vs Annie Christie / Ashley Emison2-6, 3-6
2023-09-20vs ERoach/SJPragasam (Jeff Adams)Won 20
W#1 DoublesFpommeFrances Pommells / Trisha Hyso vs Elizabeth Kennard / Vicki King7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGladys Shinmoto / Caitlin Steele vs Elyse Maiorini / Kate Loor6-2, 6-3
2023-09-13vs CArevalo/DMaguire (Queens)Won 20
W#1 DoublesHolly Bandel / FpommeFrances Pommells vs Shefali Chudgar / Yin Han6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChivonne Hunter / Christine Miles vs Lillie Renbarger / Reshma Vora6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-09-04vs AMinish (Life Time)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesTrisha Hyso / Gladys Shinmoto vs Jackie Gyoerkoe / Kristen FitzGerald2-6, 4-6
2023-08-23vs NBadr (Queens)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesRamonette Belen / Gladys Shinmoto vs Katherine Jay / Emily McEwen4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCaitlin Steele / Chivonne Hunter vs Nicole Badr / Cynthia Hoover4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesFpommeFrances Pommells / Qing Yang vs Marissa Bialecki / Morgan Simon6-0, 7-5
2023-08-16vs AChristie (PPRSC)Split 11
W#2 DoublesFpommeFrances Pommells / Holly Bandel vs Mary Oakley / Karin Britt6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKatie Perry / Gladys Shinmoto vs Annie Christie / Allison Kohlbusch2-6, 3-6
2023-08-09vs LCulp/SDeVries (Queens)Won 10
W#1 DoublesFpommeFrances Pommells / Holly Bandel vs Anne Morgan / Briana Ferraro7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Chivonne Hunter
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
FpommeFrances Pommells
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.20
Ramonette Belen
published
3.01
Gladys Shinmoto
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.76
Trisha Hyso
published
2.41
Sharon Smaston
published
Karen Morgan
published
Melina Adcock
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chivonne Hunter
34W–36L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
FpommeFrances Pommells
58W–39L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Ramonette Belen
13W–20L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Gladys Shinmoto
100W–119L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.01
Trisha Hyso
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
2.76
Sharon Smaston
5W–19L career · no lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
2.41
Karen Morgan
8W–18L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melina Adcock
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.