Teams

Mendoza 40s 3.0M Singles Tues PM

2026 Piedmont Singles 40+ · 3.0 Men Singles Tues

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-21Won 20
W#1 SinglesBrant Davenport vs William Davis6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesJuan Fernandez vs Samuel Wright6-4, 6-3
2026-07-14vs KING 40s 3.0M Singles Tues PMSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMIKAEL SCHILL vs William Davis7-6, 6-4
L#2 SinglesJJ Flores vs BRIAN KING5-7, 5-7
2026-07-07vs KING 40s 3.0M Singles Tues PMWon 20
W#1 SinglesJJ Flores vs Samuel Wright6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMIKAEL SCHILL vs George Vamvakas6-1, 6-2
2026-06-30vs KING 40s 3.0M Singles Tues PMWon 20
W#1 SinglesBrant Davenport vs William Davis6-0, 6-4
W#3 SinglesJuan Fernandez vs George Vamvakas7-5, 6-4
2026-06-23vs KING 40s 3.0M Singles Tues PMSplit 11
W#1 SinglesBrant Davenport vs William Davis6-0, 6-2
L#3 SinglesJuan Fernandez vs Saroj Patnaik1-6, 3-6
2026-06-16Won 10
W#3 SinglesRod Mendoza vs Samuel Wright6-0, 6-1
2026-06-09vs KING 40s 3.0M Singles Tues PMWon 21
W#1 SinglesBrant Davenport vs Carlos Castellanos6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMIKAEL SCHILL vs William Davis6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesJuan Fernandez vs Saroj Patnaik4-6, 4-6
2026-06-02vs KING 40s 3.0M Singles Tues PMWon 20
W#2 SinglesRod Mendoza vs George Vamvakas6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesBrant Davenport vs Samuel Wright6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men Singles Tues have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Brant Davenport
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3
3.06
Juan Fernandez
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.79
Rod Mendoza
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.76
MIKAEL SCHILL
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.72
JJ Flores
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rod Mendoza + Brant Davenport224 matchesnot enough data
JJ Flores + MIKAEL SCHILL123 matchesnot enough data
MIKAEL SCHILL + Brant Davenport213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brant Davenport
25W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.07
Juan Fernandez
17W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.06
Rod Mendoza
18W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
MIKAEL SCHILL
12W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.76
JJ Flores
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.