Teams

Gimme A Break

2026 COMBO · 8.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-06-14vs JNCC Newk emLost 02
L#2 DoublesMelody DuPerier / Maria Chase vs Yoko Murray / Cindy Quigley4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKathryn Roohan / Sandy Collier vs Beth Hittle / Nicole Gradeless5-7, 1-6
2026-06-13vs Team XLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Flint / Maria Chase vs Virginia Kaklamani / Emily Hines6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNicole Alfrey / Susan Danielson vs Jessica Ryan / Angelica Padilla7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKathryn Roohan / Sandy Collier vs Ava Wood / Kim Williford2-6, 4-6
2026-06-13vs Lynn's ChicasLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelody DuPerier / Leslie Cooper vs Kristin Ortiz / Bridget Noack3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSandy Collier / Kathryn Roohan vs Catherine Babbitt / Paula Decas1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesNicole Alfrey / Susan Danielson vs Veronica Flores / Nancy Price6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 8.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lynn's Chicas40102572
2Disruptors31841197
3JNCC Newk em226614115
4Team X133920131
5Gimme A Break043920132

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Nicole Alfrey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.05
Melody DuPerier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.84
Maria Chase
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.74
Susan Danielson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.58
Sandy Collier
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Kathryn Roohan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathryn Roohan + Sandy Collier101243% games−1.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicole Alfrey
21W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
4.37
Melody DuPerier
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
4.05
Maria Chase
18W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.84
Susan Danielson
18W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
Sandy Collier
11W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
Kathryn Roohan
10W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.