Teams

IA-REG-Russell/55&Over8.0M

55 & Over 6.0 & 8.0 Section Championships · 8.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.67 / ST. LOUIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings7 teams · 8.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1STLWC/Williams/55&Over8.0M000000
2HOA-REG-Claussen/55&Over 8.0M000000
3IA-REG-Russell/55&Over8.0M000000
4NE-REG-Leahy/55&Over8.0M000000
5OK-REG-Lane000000
6STL-REG-Shouldis/55&Over8.0M000000
7KS-REG-Shipp/55&Over8.0M000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
William Hughes
published
3.59
Dustin Guinn
published 4
3.54
Joe Slavens
published
3.41
Christopher Bryant
published 3.5
3.29
Charles Mahoski
published 3.5
Ronald Butcher
published
Tim Wilson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Hughes + Christopher Bryant3548% games−3.7% vs expected
Christopher Bryant + Tim Wilson2346% gamesnot enough data
Joe Slavens + Christopher Bryant314 matchesnot enough data
Joe Slavens + Ronald Butcher134 matchesnot enough data
William Hughes + Joe Slavens123 matchesnot enough data
William Hughes + Ronald Butcher303 matchesnot enough data
Charles Mahoski + Christopher Bryant213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Hughes
22W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Dustin Guinn
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.59
Joe Slavens
21W–23L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Christopher Bryant
19W–25L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%75%24%
3.41
3.5
Charles Mahoski
18W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.29
Ronald Butcher
21W–30L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tim Wilson
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.