Teams

Bunch 40s 3.5W Singles Wed PM

2026 Piedmont Singles 40+ · 3.5 Women Singles Wed PM

8 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 SinglesLaJean Morrow Smith vs Cameron Wannamaker3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesCassidy MacKay vs Mandi Clift2-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesJennifer Yates vs Deirdre Hjelt1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Yates vs Allenoush Beard1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesCassidy MacKay vs Deirdre Hjelt1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKelen Walker vs Katelyn Chapman4-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesAmy Bunch vs Deirdre Hjelt2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMonica Billingsley vs Allenoush Beard2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesCassidy MacKay vs Mandi Clift2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTeri Bramsway vs Deirdre Hjelt5-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesKelen Walker vs Kathy Falls6-1, 6-4
L#3 SinglesAmy Bunch vs Cheryl Scott0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLaJean Morrow Smith vs Mandi Clift1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAndrea Spencer vs Kathy Falls3-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesMonica Billingsley vs Deirdre Hjelt2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTeri Bramsway vs Katelyn Chapman3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAndrea Spencer vs Courtney Jones7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesMonica Billingsley vs Kimberly Franz0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Women Singles Wed PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Franz/Scott 40s 3.5W Singles Wed PM802225107
2Bunch 40s 3.5W Singles Wed PM0822244271

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Kelen Walker
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.23
Amy Bunch
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Teri Bramsway
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.14
LaJean Morrow Smith
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.09
Monica Billingsley
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.04
Jennifer Yates
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.93
Cassidy MacKay
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.86
Andrea Spencer
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica Billingsley + Cassidy MacKay213 matchesnot enough data
Cassidy MacKay + Teri Bramsway213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelen Walker
32W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Amy Bunch
31W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.23
Teri Bramsway
29W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
LaJean Morrow Smith
11W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
Monica Billingsley
20W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.09
Jennifer Yates
8W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Cassidy MacKay
26W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Andrea Spencer
17W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.