Teams

LATA40/Swalgren/LCTC

2023 Adult 40 & Over - USTA · Adult Women - 3.5 - Night

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-03-27vs LATA40/JOYE/LCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesGina Hilts / Cathy Cagney vs Gena McCoy / Shelley Lindler6-1, 6-1
2023-03-20Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDebbie Gee / Cathy Cagney vs Laura Kane / Rebecca Coleman2-6, 2-6
2023-03-13vs LATA40/Sutton/CTFCLost 01
L#1 DoublesCathy Cagney / Gina Hilts vs Kris Sutton / Pamela DeBessonet3-6, 2-6
2023-03-06vs LATA40/Mathews/RCWon 10
W#2 DoublesTonya Swalgren / Cathy Cagney vs Beverly Hill / Teresa Tracy6-2, 6-3
2023-02-20vs LATA40/Stewart/MPLost 01
L#2 DoublesGina Hilts / Cathy Cagney vs Cresta Stewart / Paulette Nulman1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women - 3.5 - Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Corrina Kleemoff
published 3.5
3.34
Traci Gilden
published
3.33
Debbie Gee
published 3.5
3.31
Cathy Cagney
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Chris Lefebvre
published 3.5
3.24
Denise Holmes
published 3.5
3.15
Kris Long
published
3.15
Tonya Swalgren
published
2.84
Kristin Wood
published
Elizabeth Morrison
published
Gina Hilts
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Traci Gilden + Chris Lefebvre4452% games+6.6% vs expected
Tonya Swalgren + Denise Holmes10357% games+5.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Corrina Kleemoff
26W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.44
Traci Gilden
38W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Debbie Gee
34W–30L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Cathy Cagney
47W–45L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Chris Lefebvre
14W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Denise Holmes
20W–28L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.24
Kris Long
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.15
Tonya Swalgren
15W–14L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
Kristin Wood
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
2.84
Elizabeth Morrison
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Gina Hilts
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.