Teams

LCTA55/Pettersen/MPR

Other Mixed Doubles 55 & Over Adult · 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-11vs LCTA55/Lee/MPRWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaul Kaye / Annmarie Taggio vs Theodore Manos / Kelly Kruse6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDavid Bruner / Stacey Cordina vs Charlotte Gerber / John Lester6-2, 6-0
2026-06-27vs LCTA55/Magnuson/LTPDIWon 21
W#1 DoublesFrank Pettersen / Annmarie Taggio vs Samantha Walton / Keith Pridgen6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCeil Bruner / David Bruner vs Stefanie McCarron / Bart Lawrence6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesThomas Reagan / Brenda Reagan vs Kirsten Lanphear / David Hubbard2-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesFrank Pettersen / Viktoria Payne vs Mark Leeds / Jennifer Williams5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Bruner / Ceil Bruner vs Peter Brechtel / Sarah Dacosta7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrent Herlong / Jane Eckhardt vs Gary Batts / Molly Sapienza1-6, 1-6
2026-06-13vs LCTA55/Laquara/MaybankLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnnmarie Taggio / Frank Pettersen vs Stephanie Jacky / David Jacky7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBrenda Reagan / Thomas Reagan vs Jane Dowd / Sam Wilburn5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChris Lane / Stacey Cordina vs Diana Shirley / Garrett Riggins6-0, 0-6, 0-1
2026-05-31vs LCTA55/Laquara/MaybankWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrenda Reagan / Thomas Reagan vs Michael Laquara / Diana Shirley6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCeil Bruner / David Bruner vs Beth Mandell / Garrett Riggins6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJane Eckhardt / Mike Cladakis vs Beth Matheson / Stephen Yetman6-0, 6-4
2026-05-30vs LCTA55/Lee/MPRLost 12
L#1 DoublesCeil Bruner / David Bruner vs Jeannie Golden / Bo McNinch4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesFrank Pettersen / Annmarie Taggio vs Leonard Douglas / Genevieve McCutcheon6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesStacey Cordina / Thomas Reagan vs Kelly Kruse / Theodore Manos6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2026-05-23vs LCTA55/Magnuson/LTPDIWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnnmarie Taggio / David Marion vs Keith Pridgen / Stefanie McCarron0-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJane Eckhardt / Mike Cladakis vs Neil Johnson / Julie Rhomberg-Miller6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesViktoria Payne / Frank Pettersen vs David Hubbard / Patricia Schuster6-1, 6-1
L#1 DoublesDavid Marion / Melinda Gengarella vs Corinne Updegrave / Angus Garfield3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrent Herlong / Stacey Cordina vs Amy Poch / Gary Batts4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Bertolini / Jane Eckhardt vs Elyssa Snelgrove / Mark Leeds2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Paul Kaye
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Viktoria Payne
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.86
Jenny Frantz
published
3.79
Ceil Bruner
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.76
Frank Pettersen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
David Bruner
published 4
David Marion
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Brenda Reagan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Brent Herlong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Annmarie Taggio
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.63
Robert Bertolini
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Stacey Cordina
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Mike Cladakis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
Chris Lane
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Jane Eckhardt
published
Melinda Gengarella
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Reagan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brenda Reagan + Thomas Reagan224 matchesnot enough data
Jane Eckhardt + Mike Cladakis224 matchesnot enough data
Frank Pettersen + Annmarie Taggio303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Kaye
79W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.96
Viktoria Payne
73W–49L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
3.91
Jenny Frantz
5W–6L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Ceil Bruner
5W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
Frank Pettersen
75W–48L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.76
4
David Bruner
52W–20L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
David Marion
1W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Brenda Reagan
7W–7L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Brent Herlong
68W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Annmarie Taggio
74W–70L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Robert Bertolini
73W–80L career · 1 line in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.63
Stacey Cordina
38W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.61
Mike Cladakis
40W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Chris Lane
19W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.50
Jane Eckhardt
18W–16L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Melinda Gengarella
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Thomas Reagan
4W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.