Teams

Zimmerman JTCC

2022 Prince Georges Adult 18 & Over · Prince Georges Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2022-06-25vs AcersWon 10
W#1 DoublesJon Anders / Kyle Spinks vs Dennis DuPree / John Burns7-6, 3-2
2022-05-22vs AcersLost 01
L#1 DoublesKyle Spinks / Nate Eagle vs John Burns / Mario Walker4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-05-21vs AcersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJoshua Lee / Bryan Bassig vs Bill Keating / Rudolph Isaac6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKyle Spinks vs Neeraj Gupta3-6, 4-6
2022-05-14vs AcersWon 10
W#1 SinglesBryan Bassig vs Rudolph Isaac7-5, 6-4
2022-04-30vs AcersLost 01
L#1 DoublesKyle Spinks / Eric Taylor vs Scott Womack / Rudolph Isaac0-6, 3-6
2022-04-24vs AcersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKyle Spinks / Nate Eagle vs Charlie JONES / Jonathan Lee6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBryan Bassig / Brian Jalaian vs Dennis DuPree / Raymond Lyons6-7, 3-4
2022-04-23Won 10
W#1 SinglesBryan Bassig vs Vernon Carter6-1, 6-3
2022-04-16vs AcersWon 20
W#1 DoublesJon Anders / Kyle Spinks vs Bill Keating / Wesley Cooper6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesBryan Bassig vs Rudolph Isaac7-5, 6-3
2022-04-10vs AcersWon 20
W#1 DoublesJon Anders / Kyle Spinks vs Desmond LaMar / Wesley Cooper6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBryan Bassig / Matt Dale vs Dennis DuPree / Raymond Lyons6-4, 6-1
2022-04-03Won 10
W#1 SinglesKyle Spinks vs Bill Keating6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2022-04-02vs AcersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKyle Spinks / Jon Anders vs Kudzai Mukushi / Jonathan Lee6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBryan Bassig vs Rudolph Isaac6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Bryan Bassig
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.27
Tim McNamara
published
3.22
Jon Anders
published
3.09
Taurean Branch
published
3.03
Kyle Spinks
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #1 Singles 22% · published 3
2.75
Dean Griffith
published 3
Jordan Zimmerman
published
Matt Dale
published
Nate Eagle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jon Anders + Tim McNamara7360% games+8.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bryan Bassig
143W–61L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
3.55
Tim McNamara
94W–37L career · no lines in 2022
<1%2%98%
3.27
Jon Anders
60W–44L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Taurean Branch
12W–10L career · no lines in 2022
23%76%<1%
3.09
3
Kyle Spinks
98W–61L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Dean Griffith
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Jordan Zimmerman
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Matt Dale
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nate Eagle
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.