Teams

LGCH-Chast/Westport65_3.0

2025 Lake USTA 65 & Over League · Men 3.0 Tues PM

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-22vs LLTO-TOWNLEY NMPWon 20
W#1 DoublesGeorge Chast / Dan Kartes vs Greg Brown / Francis Bolger6-1, 2-3
W#3 DoublesDennis Pirkl / Larry Roberts vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-15vs LLTO-TOWNLEY NMPWon 20
W#1 DoublesJames Dalmas / Dennis Pirkl vs Greg Brown / Jim Staley6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDan Kartes / Tommy Huskey vs Keith MacVean / Gary Powell6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-08vs LLTO-TOWNLEY NMPWon 10
W#2 DoublesDennis Pirkl / Stuart Smith vs Keith MacVean / Baxter Price6-3, 6-0
2025-04-01vs LLTO-TOWNLEY NMPWon 10
W#2 DoublesDan Kartes / Steve Peterson vs Baxter Price / Thomas Bowker6-1, 6-0
2025-03-25vs LLTO-TOWNLEY NMPWon 20
W#1 DoublesDan Kartes / Steve Peterson vs Francis Bolger / Jim Staley6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDennis Pirkl / George Chast vs Baxter Price / Larry Townley6-2, 6-2
2025-03-18vs LLTO-TOWNLEY NMPSplit 11
L#2 DoublesGeorge Chast / Stuart Smith vs Francis Bolger / Keith MacVean6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDan Kartes / Doug Thompson vs Steve Riddle / Thomas Bowker6-1, 7-5
2025-03-11vs LLTO-TOWNLEY NMPWon 20
W#2 DoublesDoug Thompson / Dennis Pirkl vs Larry Townley / Thomas Bowker6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesStuart Smith / Dan Kartes vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-04vs LLTO-TOWNLEY NMPWon 20
W#1 DoublesDale Peterson / Dennis Pirkl vs Jim Staley / Greg Brown6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDan Kartes / Stuart Smith vs Larry Townley / Baxter Price6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.0 Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
James Dalmas
published
3.06
Dan Kartes
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.98
Stuart Smith
published
2.87
Dennis Pirkl
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Dale Peterson
published 3
2.67
George Chast
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Larry Roberts
published
Robert Breeden
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dennis Pirkl + George Chast134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

James Dalmas
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.09
3
Dan Kartes
27W–20L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.06
Stuart Smith
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Dennis Pirkl
96W–66L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Dale Peterson
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
3
George Chast
68W–93L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
Larry Roberts
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Breeden
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.