Teams

BC-MiraCosta/AnneDeMartini3.5

2026 SoCal Doubles - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings15 teams · BC Women - 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BC-WestEnd/BrendaKodani3.5000000
2BC-MiraCosta/ElizabethPark3.5000000
3BC-AltaVista/KarieLanterman3.5000000
4BC-SouthEnd/KathyKim3.5000000
5BC-BillieJeanKing/BeejellSoco3.5000000
6BC-PVTC/TriciaRapaport3.5000000
7BC-MCC/AmySchmargen3.5000000
8BC-MCC/KristieSherrill3.5000000
9BC-ElSegundo/SusanMoreno3.5000000
10BC-MiraCosta/AnneDeMartini3.5000000
11BC-AltaVista/SondeeWolff3.5000000
12BC-Kramer/ColleenPost3.5000000
13BC-MCC/LesleyLyon3.5000000
14BC-Peninsula/PattiYork3.5000000
15BC-WestEnd/TakakoTary3.5000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Kari Carpino
published
3.20
Mari Bellas
published
3.18
Amy Eastman
published 3.5
3.13
Maricel Rocha
published
2.93
2.83
Kathryn Gray
published
2.77
Anne DeMartini
published 3
2.69
Evelyn Borgatta
published
Nicole Shepley
published
Olsen Kirsten
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kari Carpino
41W–99L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Mari Bellas
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Amy Eastman
4W–10L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Maricel Rocha
5W–8L career · no lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Carrie Arboleda Scott
0W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.93
Kathryn Gray
1W–5L career · no lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
2.83
3
Anne DeMartini
5W–12L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Cambria McCulloch
11W–10L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Evelyn Borgatta
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Nicole Shepley
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Olsen Kirsten
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.