Teams

WNCS King (Blk Mtn Cts)

Adult 55 & Over USTA WNC 2025 · 55 & O 3.0 women Sat morning

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-09vs WNCG Anderson (HRC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSheryl King / Mary Stang vs Gay Anderson / Clara Balling0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMary Jo Sparrow / Jane Larson vs Barbara Weinland / Michal Baird0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJackie Garrison / Cheryl Keefer vs Cathy Childress / Debra Highsmith3-6, 4-6
2025-05-03vs WNCS Vittoria (ARC S)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMaddie Linder / Patricia Weathers vs Sammie Vittoria / Virginia Scarola3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJackie Garrison / Jane Larson vs Linda Dulin / Miluska Kusz5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSheryl King / Cheryl Keefer vs Darcy Gilson / Sumandeep Groh5-7, 4-6
2025-04-30vs WNCD Abrams (Peachtree)Won 21
W#1 DoublesMaureen Marino / Debbie Wanser vs Debra Abrams / Betty Hollingsworth6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSheryl King / Cheryl Keefer vs Mary Jo Ksenich / Michele Deudne6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMary Stang / Jackie Garrison vs Wendy Deudne / Jae Kim3-6, 0-6
2025-04-18vs WNCG Anderson (HRC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesMaureen Marino / Debbie Wanser vs Gay Anderson / Heather North7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaddie Linder / Mary Stang vs Christina Phan / Clara Balling3-6, 6-7
2025-04-12vs WNCS Vittoria (ARC S)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDebbie Wanser / Maureen Marino vs Sue Thomas / Zsuzsanna Brooks7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Jo Sparrow / Rhonda Reedy vs Sally Boerschig / Miluska Kusz2-6, 1-6
2025-04-05vs WNCD Abrams (Peachtree)Split 11
W#1 DoublesDebbie Wanser / Cheryl Keefer vs Betty Hollingsworth / Susan Sessa6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMary Jo Sparrow / Patricia Weathers vs Mary Jo Ksenich / Wendy Deudne1-6, 6-7
2025-03-28vs WNCG Anderson (HRC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Stang / Patricia Weathers vs Cathy Childress / Karen Watson1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMaureen Marino / Jackie Garrison vs Christina Phan / Margaret Peggy Sanders6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJane Larson / Rhonda Reedy vs Gay Anderson / Heather North2-6, 3-6
2025-03-21vs WNCS Vittoria (ARC S)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJane Larson / Patricia Weathers vs Sammie Vittoria / Linda Dulin6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJackie Garrison / Rhonda Reedy vs Tammy Wrenn / Debbie Berry3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMaureen Marino / Marilyn Senz vs Virginia Scarola / Sue Thomas1-6, 1-6
2025-03-14vs WNCD Abrams (Peachtree)Split 11
W#1 DoublesDebbie Wanser / Maureen Marino vs Betty Hollingsworth / Ann McAndrews7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJackie Garrison / Jane Larson vs Jae Kim / Mary Jo Ksenich1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & O 3.0 women Sat morning have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Mary Jo Sparrow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Debbie Wanser
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Cheryl Keefer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Jackie Garrison
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jane Larson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Maddie Linder
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Marilyn Senz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Stang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Maureen Marino
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Patricia Weathers
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Rhonda Reedy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sheryl King
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Wanser + Maureen Marino314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Jo Sparrow
0W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.82
3
Debbie Wanser
4W–1L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Cheryl Keefer
6W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Jackie Garrison
0W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jane Larson
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maddie Linder
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marilyn Senz
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mary Stang
0W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maureen Marino
3W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Weathers
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rhonda Reedy
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sheryl King
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.