Teams

CED:Court Ordered:Hayden

2025 EMA Tri Level Fall · 3.0 Women 1

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-02vs CED:Cedardale:LaFleurWon 10
W#1 DoublesAngela Hayden / Emily Norton vs Sarah Torrisi / Shirley Ciccolo3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-10-26vs NEW:Neburyport:ZizzaLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathleen Bass / Angela Hayden vs Caroline Jolliffe / Carrie Zizza1-6, 4-6
2025-10-12vs CED:Cedardale:LaFleurWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichele Chicoine / Sharon Stearns vs Shirley Ciccolo / Lisa LaFleur6-2, 7-5
2025-10-05vs NEW:Neburyport:ZizzaLost 01
L#1 DoublesEmily Norton / Kathleen Bass vs Rosemary Turgeon / Devon Palermino6-7, 6-7
2025-09-21vs CED:Cedardale:LaFleurWon 10
W#1 DoublesToni Cavallini / Emily Norton vs Shirley Ciccolo / Jacqueline Bolduc6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-14vs NEW:Neburyport:ZizzaLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathleen Bass / Toni Cavallini vs Devon Palermino / Rosemary Turgeon2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Michele Chicoine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Sharon Stearns
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Angela Hayden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Kathleen Bass
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Toni Cavallini
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Hayden + Toni Cavallini6163% games+11.4% vs expected
Michele Chicoine + Sharon Stearns7259% games−0.1% vs expected
Toni Cavallini + Sharon Stearns4158% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Bass + Sharon Stearns404 matchesnot enough data
Toni Cavallini + Kathleen Bass213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michele Chicoine
78W–47L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.07
Sharon Stearns
52W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Angela Hayden
60W–50L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
Kathleen Bass
70W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.92
Toni Cavallini
99W–62L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.