Teams

HFII RED

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

9 players · average NTRP 2.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-03vs GAC BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesGreg Mohrman / Andrew Troyer vs Jim Lord / Allan Hoover7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMatthew Linnell vs Eric Edwards1-6, 2-6
2025-08-18vs LTFC YELLOWWon 30
W#1 DoublesBill Case / David Lowe vs Peter Marle / Bruce Ohman3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesGreg Mohrman vs Samir Witta6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrian Hunter / Andrew Troyer vs Michael Detampel / Nathan Raper7-5, 6-2
2025-08-04vs SKY GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesBrian Hunter / Andrew Troyer vs Steven Mihan / Chris Murphy3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBrian Perkins vs Douglas Poirier3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBradley Cole / Jeremy Robbins vs Jon Kalstein / John Camins3-6, 3-6
2025-07-28vs HV REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeremy Robbins / Greg Mohrman vs Brian Nowlin / Joel Pehrson6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAndrew Troyer vs Michael Kershner6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Panis / Bradley Cole vs Brandon Whalen / Travis Eide6-7, 2-6
2025-07-21vs HW GOLDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrian Hunter / Andrew Troyer vs Steve Serenyi / Brian Francis6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBill Case / Bradley Cole vs Ross King / Ethan Hughes2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Jeremy Robbins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.06
Greg Mohrman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.88
Andrew Troyer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.82
Brian Perkins
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.75
Matthew Linnell
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Bill Case
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Josh Haynes
published
2.29
Bradley Cole
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Michael Panis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Greg Mohrman + Jeremy Robbins303 matchesnot enough data
Josh Haynes + Bradley Cole123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeremy Robbins
14W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.17
3
Greg Mohrman
31W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Andrew Troyer
25W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Brian Perkins
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%91%9%
2.82
Matthew Linnell
17W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Bill Case
10W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Josh Haynes
20W–28L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
2.5
Bradley Cole
10W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.29
Michael Panis
7W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.