Teams

The Forest - Lowe

2024 LEECHARLOTTE Adult 40 & Over Winter Weeknight · 3.0 W Monday EVE

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-03-18vs LEECHAR/Wonnenberg/40&Over3.0WWon 10
W#1 SinglesDorothy Waldron vs Liz Leddy6-2, 6-1
2024-02-12vs The Landings - WeiWon 10
W#1 DoublesDorothy Waldron / Angela Sterious vs Alexandria Dahms / Linda McMillan6-1, 6-3
2024-02-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesDorothy Waldron / Angela Sterious vs Tiffany Gaede / Natalie Cunningham6-4, 6-3
2024-01-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesBeth Andrews / Dorothy Waldron vs Karen Bremenstul / Becky Carlson6-1, 6-4
2024-01-15vs LEECHAR/Wonnenberg/40&Over3.0WWon 10
W#2 DoublesDorothy Waldron / Brenda Pitts vs Amy Prenger / Megan Martin6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 W Monday EVE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Dorothy Waldron
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.16
Terri Brown
published
3.00
Mary Lowe
published
2.92
Angela Sterious
published 3
2.88
Candace Schecter
published 3
2.83
Ann Difilippo
published 3
2.76
Beth Andrews
published 3
Brenda Pitts
published 3
2.72
Claudia Rands
published 3
2.57
Carolyn Krause
published 3
2.48
Diane Chilcote
published 3
Jodee Siriano
published
Sandra Kent
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Difilippo + Mary Lowe5060% games+11.3% vs expected
Dorothy Waldron + Candace Schecter134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Dorothy Waldron
88W–70L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Terri Brown
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
Mary Lowe
21W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Angela Sterious
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Candace Schecter
13W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Ann Difilippo
8W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Beth Andrews
29W–37L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Brenda Pitts
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Claudia Rands
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%2%
2.72
3
Carolyn Krause
2W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
2.57
3
Diane Chilcote
7W–11L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.48
Jodee Siriano
0W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sandra Kent
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.