Teams

Jussely/Memphis

2026 Combo 18 & Over - Memphis · 5.0 18 & Over Women

8 players · average NTRP / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 9 9:00 AM
Chickasaw Country Club
Sep 16 11:00 AM
Memphis Univ. School
2026-09-02vs Carmichael/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelcie Nollner / Julie Upchurch vs Toni Carmichael / Lisa Warren6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRussell Chambliss / Holly Cousar vs Allison McCool / Keneisha Fountain6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMandy Gootzeit / Marissa Benedict vs Hannah Smith / Caroline Gaia6-0, 6-1
2026-08-26vs Wisley/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesRussell Chambliss / Holly Cousar vs Ellie Gibbs / Jennifer Stettler5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKristi Crawford / Tracy Lombardo vs Mary Margaret Posey / Samantha Rohlinger1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKIMBERLY JUSSELY / Flavia Posey vs Taylor Wisley / Kerstin Wright3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-19vs Folk/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristi Crawford / Tracy Lombardo vs Mary-Grace Gentry / Amber McCabe6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKIMBERLY JUSSELY / Holly Cousar vs Emily D Folk / Allison Cleeton6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMandy Gootzeit / Flavia Posey vs Mary Anne Pohlman / Ashley Powers2-6, 4-6
2026-08-12vs Carmichael/MemphisWon 20
W#1 DoublesKIMBERLY JUSSELY / Marissa Benedict vs Toni Carmichael / Allison McCool6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Upchurch / Kelcie Nollner vs Wendy Spas / Jeressia Williamson6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 5.0 18 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Jussely/Memphis2051332
2Cleveland/Memphis1142550
3Justice/ Memphis122715102
4Carmichael/Memphis02151064

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.29 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.71
Holly Cousar
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.63
Kelcie Nollner
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.30
Julie Upchurch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.27
Tracy Lombardo
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.24
Mandy Gootzeit
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.17
Russell Chambliss
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.05
KIMBERLY JUSSELY
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
1.96
Flavia Posey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelcie Nollner + Julie Upchurch10356% games+8.8% vs expected
Holly Cousar + KIMBERLY JUSSELY303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Holly Cousar
14W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%7%93%
2.71
Kelcie Nollner
17W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%18%82%
2.63
Julie Upchurch
14W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.30
Tracy Lombardo
11W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
Mandy Gootzeit
4W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Russell Chambliss
6W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
KIMBERLY JUSSELY
8W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Flavia Posey
1W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.