Teams

BBTL40/Gilchrist/Sun City

Mixed 40 & Over - USTA · Mixed 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-26vs BBLT40/MillerRichard/TLCLost 03
L#1 DoublesJohn Anderson / Suzanne Bates vs Randy Marcotte / Teresa Moore6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSteven Nygren / Sally Bouthot vs Kevin Cain / Sheri Holt6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMitchell Billek / Patti Gilchrist vs Scott Jennings / CHARLENE WOODALL6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-07-19vs BBTL (A) 3.5M 40 & Over (Pulkinen)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Bates / Troy Havens vs Sarah Galligher / Ed Pulkinen6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMildred Newman / David S. Hale vs christian galligher / Amy Jones4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSally Bouthot / John Anderson vs Nicolette Hyland / Steven Bowden3-6, 4-6
2026-07-08vs BBLT40/MillerRichard/TLCWon 20
W#2 DoublesSusan Peters / Steven Nygren vs Sara Remigio / Jim Still6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMelissa Dawson / Dave Bogan vs CHARLENE WOODALL / Randy Marcotte7-6, 6-3
2026-06-28vs BBTL (A) 3.5M 40 & Over (Pulkinen)Split 11
W#1 DoublesTroy Havens / Pam Harms vs John Ryan / Cathy Pulkinen6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMitchell Billek / Fiona Harwood vs Ed Pulkinen / Nicki Alessi4-6, 4-6
2026-06-22vs BBLT40/MillerRichard/TLCWon 30
W#1 DoublesPam Harms / Troy Havens vs Scott Jennings / Sheri Holt6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesFiona Harwood / William Harwood vs Kimberly Collett / Jim Still7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMelissa Dawson / Dave Bogan vs CHARLENE WOODALL / Richard Rickabaugh6-1, 6-2
2026-06-07vs BBTL (A) 3.5M 40 & Over (Pulkinen)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Bates / John Bell vs Matthew Haschak / Laurie White3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSteven Nygren / Susan Peters vs christian galligher / Amy Jones2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPatti Gilchrist / Dave Bogan vs Mary Warner / Craig Warner3-6, 4-6
2026-05-27vs BBLT40/MillerRichard/TLCWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaurie Williams / William Harwood vs Jim Still / Sara Remigio6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPam Harms / John Bell vs Randy Marcotte / Teresa Moore6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMitchell Billek / Mildred Newman vs Tom Bulat / CHARLENE WOODALL4-6, 3-6
2026-05-17vs BBTL (A) 3.5M 40 & Over (Pulkinen)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid S. Hale / Fiona Harwood vs Matthew Haschak / Laurie White3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPaul Lebiecz / Susan Peters vs Ed Pulkinen / Mary Warner2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDave Bogan / Melissa Dawson vs Michael Hyland / Nicolette Hyland4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Mixed 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BBTL (A) 3.5M 40 & Over (Pulkinen)5315921206
2BBTL40/Gilchrist/Sun City44121226208
3BBLT40/MillerRichard/TLC3591534256

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Troy Havens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Steven Nygren
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Mildred Newman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.42
Pam Harms
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.42
William Harwood
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Sally Bouthot
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
David S. Hale
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Dave Bogan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Suzanne Bates
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Fiona Harwood
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Paul Lebiecz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Melissa Dawson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Laurie Williams
published
Patti Gilchrist
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Fiona Harwood + William Harwood2354% gamesnot enough data
Dave Bogan + Melissa Dawson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Troy Havens
77W–53L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.47
Steven Nygren
32W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Mildred Newman
86W–61L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Pam Harms
47W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
William Harwood
15W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
Sally Bouthot
42W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
David S. Hale
2W–7L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
3.5
Dave Bogan
26W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.24
Suzanne Bates
23W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.24
Fiona Harwood
25W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Paul Lebiecz
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
Melissa Dawson
21W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%2%98%
2.79
Laurie Williams
25W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Patti Gilchrist
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.