Teams

SoCal/Stanley/18&Over2.5W

2022 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD · SD - Women - 2.5

6 players · average NTRP 3.30 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-03vs SD 2.5 Balboa TC/ Bergland (3)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Shibuya / Amy Bondoc vs Janet Bergland / Mary Warshaw5-7, 2-6
2022-05-27vs SD 2.5 Montevalle Rec/ Limon (2:1)Split 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Shibuya / Erina Rodrigues vs Edith Limon / Rosemarie De Silva1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesIrma Ibarra / Hikari Blancarte vs Catherine Block / Cinthia Borbon6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesIrma Ibarra / Hikari Blancarte vs Brenda Henriquez / Rosemarie De Silva6-4, 6-2
2022-05-06vs SD 2.5 Barnes TC/ Rivera (3)Won 10
W#1 DoublesYasuko Stanley / Karen Shibuya vs Eliza Arechiga / Sahara C Vazquez M6-2, 6-2
2022-04-29vs SD 2.5 Balboa TC/ Bergland (3)Won 20
W#1 DoublesEMIKO SHOJIMA / Irma Ibarra vs Chelsea Obrochta / Mary Warshaw6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesHikari Blancarte / NANA WILLIAMS vs Anja Dixson / Polina Cherevichnaya6-2, 6-3
2022-04-15vs SD 2.5 Coronado TC/ Anderson (2:1)Split 11
W#1 SinglesHikari Blancarte vs Claudia Nelson6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesYasuko Stanley / Karen Shibuya vs Alisa Dunn / Jennie Vandenakker7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2022-04-01vs SD 2.5 Barnes TC/ Rivera (3)Won 10
W#1 DoublesHikari Blancarte / Amy Bondoc vs Denisse Fax / Rebecca Robb1-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
3.19
Yasuko Stanley
published 3.5
3.15
Irma Ibarra
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published 3.5
3.00
Hikari Blancarte
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.88
Karen Shibuya
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.21
Teresa Vega
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hikari Blancarte + Yasuko Stanley8751% games+5.7% vs expected
Karen Shibuya + Hikari Blancarte51148% games−4.5% vs expected
Irma Ibarra + Hikari Blancarte314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dania Michelle Castillo
21W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%33%67%
3.56
3.5
Yasuko Stanley
64W–54L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Irma Ibarra
94W–84L career · 12 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
3
Hikari Blancarte
108W–108L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Karen Shibuya
63W–52L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%81%18%
2.88
Teresa Vega
18W–19L career · no lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.