Teams

CDTA E 18&OM4.5 1MTC Brown Sat 3 $33.5

CDTA ESL 18 & Over · CDTA E 18&O Men 4.5

17 players · average NTRP 4.38 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesMichael Bush / Ryan Pfeifle vs Rodney Berganos / Nick Werth6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesIan Barr / Justin Hetler vs Cesar Uribe / Kevin Wallace6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMark Kappelman vs Zach Atzen6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRobert Legg / Jake Guttentag vs Russell Needler / Brad Takei6-3, 6-2
L#1 DoublesIan Barr / Justin Hetler vs Eric H Lo / Kevin Porter6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJake Guttentag vs Daniel Sternfield6-1, 3-1
L#1 DoublesAlistair Templeton / Max Soghikian vs Hans-Joerg Engler / Jonathan Diamond6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCole Heule / Michael Bush vs John Laurx / Michael Hess6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRobert Legg / Matthew Schutt vs Chris Moreno / Nick Radonjic7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 DoublesCole Heule / Jamie Masnyk vs Connor Harmon / Adam Reinhart4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMax Crouse vs Jonathan Kohn5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlistair Templeton / Ryan Pfeifle vs Thomas Tranter / Andrew Wolfberg4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobert Legg / Michael Montero vs Warren San Luis / Kevin Zimmerman6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 DoublesKyle Coronel / Michael Bush vs Scott Robinson / Adam Buckley3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesCole Heule vs Daniel Nielson6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesKyle Coronel / Cole Heule vs Joshua Bandoch / Nicholas Silacci6-7, 4-2
L#2 DoublesJustin Hetler / Max Soghikian vs Joseph Shmigelsky / Jack Wennerstrum2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMatthew Schutt / Jake Guttentag vs Mitchell Rasley / Alex Martinez6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA E 18&O Men 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 18&OM4.5 5Wheaton Exner Sat 4 $206025514186
2CDTA E 18&OM4.5 1MTC Brown Sat 3 $33.551191130254
3CDTA E 18&OM4.5 3RT Tranter Sun 10 $2733111940289
4CDTA E 18&OM4.5 2Tam Needler Sun 7 $2224121837292
5CDTA E 18&OM4.5 6Naper Schmidt Sat 2 $2424141638268
6CDTA E 18&OM4.5 7Glvw Sternfield Sun 5 $2424131738281
7CDTA E 18&OM4.5 4Tam Shmigelsky Sun 7 $2115111937250

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.20 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.60
Max Crouse
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.44
Alistair Templeton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.38
Jamie Masnyk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.31
Cole Heule
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.24
Robert Legg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.22
Ryan Pfeifle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.16
Ian Barr
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.12
Jake Guttentag
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.08
Kyle Coronel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.05
Justin Hetler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.04
Brent Chatham
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.72
Jared Burstein
published 4
Mark Kappelman
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Matthew Pruyn
published
Matthew Schutt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Bush
published
Peter Hammond
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Pfeifle + Justin Hetler91249% games+4.7% vs expected
Jamie Masnyk + Cole Heule7251% games−6.0% vs expected
Justin Hetler + Ian Barr2648% gamesnot enough data
Ryan Pfeifle + Kyle Coronel4246% gamesnot enough data
Justin Hetler + Cole Heule2448% gamesnot enough data
Ryan Pfeifle + Ian Barr4160% gamesnot enough data
Justin Hetler + Robert Legg4151% gamesnot enough data
Jamie Masnyk + Ian Barr303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Max Crouse
27W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
4.60
4.5
Alistair Templeton
32W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
4.44
4.5
Jamie Masnyk
31W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%19%
4.38
4.5
Cole Heule
33W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.31
Robert Legg
12W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Ryan Pfeifle
32W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Ian Barr
49W–46L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
Jake Guttentag
6W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
4.12
Kyle Coronel
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
4.08
Justin Hetler
54W–69L career · 3 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
4.05
4
Brent Chatham
33W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
4.04
4
Jared Burstein
7W–20L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.72
Mark Kappelman
12W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Matthew Pruyn
7W–23L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Matthew Schutt
12W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Bush
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Peter Hammond
6W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.