Teams

Waynesborough 2.5 18+

Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women DelChes - Tues

16 players · average NTRP 2.50 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-16vs Lob'em and Leave'emWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlyssa Pianelli / Stina Carter vs Eleanor McNulty / Amy Spracklin7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesValerie Dickman vs Jessica Smith6-1, 6-0
2026-06-09vs Ace Ace BabyLost 12
W#1 DoublesAlyssa Pianelli / Valerie Dickman vs Ashley Leber / Julie MacArthur6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAlex Malloy vs Tiffany Giltner1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Engelkraut / Yvette Hope vs Jonida Mandarano / Libby Smith1-6, 3-6
2026-06-02vs Drop Shots - KorsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeah Lovell / Alex Malloy vs Samantha Himmelstein / Kelly Fisher6-1, 7-6
W#1 SinglesValerie Dickman vs Farren Maillie6-3, 3-5
L#2 DoublesYvette Hope / Beth Cokely vs Ann Colby-cummings / Melissa Hollander2-6, 1-6
2026-05-19vs Volley GirlsWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelissa DJamoos / Cameron Prevost vs Pamela Tedesco / Donna Myles4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJaclyn Durkin vs Nikki Campbell6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesValerie Dickman / Amy Redfield vs Lisa Mccartney / Dawn George6-3, 6-1
2026-05-05vs Get a GripLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa DJamoos / Amanda McClendon vs Kate Steimel / Nancy Giagnacova7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLeah Lovell vs Kerry Lundmark6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Engelkraut / Stina Carter vs Melanie McManus / Abigail Hisler0-6, 0-6
2026-04-28vs Set2WinWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlyssa Pianelli / Amy Redfield vs Anne Supina / Kate O'Brien3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTara Bernard vs Sharon Kenny6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Engelkraut / Meredith Orlowski vs Mita Chatterjee / Beth McBryan6-4, 6-3
2026-04-21vs Net ProfitsWon 21
L#1 DoublesLauren Zoeller / Tara Bernard vs Ashlyn Vance / Alyssa Solarz3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLeah Lovell vs Liad Pernock6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesYvette Hope / Amanda McClendon vs Nancy Hovanic / Vickie Piersimoni6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 2.5 Women DelChes - Tues
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cup 10 Ballers0631530195
2Waynesborough 2.5 18+0714717158
3BCRC Bad Aces0791224193
4Drop Shots - Wells0818615154
5Sets and the City08131125206
6Drop Shots - Korson08121227191
7Lob'em and Leave'em08111328218
8Baby got BACKHAND08121228219
9Cynwyd Rising Racquets08111330192
10HPTA AD-IN0891531211
11Lemon Drop Shots08101431220
12Luv Luv Kiss Kiss0851939256
13St Albans Wise Aces0918924230
14Stingers09101734240
15The Racquettes0991837245

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.29 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.65
Cameron Prevost
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.64
Valerie Dickman
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.47
Jaclyn Durkin
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.44
Leah Lovell
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.30
Tara Bernard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.29
Lauren Zoeller
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Amanda McClendon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Amy Redfield
published 2.5
Beth Cokely
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.24
Yvette Hope
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.20
Alyssa Pianelli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.07
Melissa DJamoos
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.07
Alex Malloy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
1.86
Karen Engelkraut
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Meredith Orlowski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stina Carter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alyssa Pianelli + Melissa DJamoos044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Cameron Prevost
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%12%88%
2.65
Valerie Dickman
11W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%14%86%
2.64
2.5
Jaclyn Durkin
9W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%58%42%
2.47
Leah Lovell
8W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%67%33%
2.44
Tara Bernard
10W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.30
Lauren Zoeller
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.29
2.5
Amanda McClendon
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Amy Redfield
1W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Beth Cokely
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Yvette Hope
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.24
2.5
Alyssa Pianelli
11W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.20
Melissa DJamoos
7W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.07
2.5
Alex Malloy
5W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Karen Engelkraut
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.86
Meredith Orlowski
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Stina Carter
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.