Teams

Parks

2026 South East Tennis Combo League 18 & OVER · Women 5.5

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-31vs Adel/SaileLost 03
L#1 DoublesKate Baynard / Caitlin Parks vs Penelope Taylor / Chloe Hockham6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLucille Williams / Neerja Amin vs Chloe Adel / Caitie Connor1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Wright / Laurel Shambley vs Kathleen Zielinski / Jaime Helms1-6, 0-6
2026-08-26vs High/RhodenhiserLost 03
L#1 DoublesKate Baynard / Caitlin Parks vs Allie Wallace / Brittany Rhodenhiser2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNeerja Amin / Liz Cleghorn vs Kacey High / Brittany Witmer5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLucille Williams / Laurel Shambley vs Ashley Rahauser / Kalyn Snow3-6, 1-6
2026-08-17vs GainerLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Strittmatter / Caitlin Parks vs Frances Kelly / Kayla Kozup4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKristen Busby Icenhour / Liz Cleghorn vs Hannah Flynt / Diane Byrd4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Wright / Lucille Williams vs Kimberly Bassano / Kathleen Curley0-6, 1-6
2026-08-10vs Smith / Malone 18+ 5.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCaitlin Parks / Kristen Busby Icenhour vs Kristin Pinder / Alice Weiser0-5, 0-0
L#2 DoublesLiz Cleghorn / Jennifer Wright vs Larissa Malone / Liz Moysey2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLaurel Shambley / Heather Lautenbach vs Aileen Sutton / Eleni Pappamihiel0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · Women 5.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Russell/McCain 5.5/18+1030118
2Smith / Malone 18+ 5.51030121
3Adel/Saile1124963
4King/Reeves Combo 5.5000000
5High/Rhodenhiser0112534
6Parks0103636
7Koch/Scalfani0103637

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 1.88 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.06
Caitlin Parks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.70
Laurel Shambley
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Heather Lautenbach
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Strittmatter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kate Baynard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kristen Busby Icenhour
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Liz Cleghorn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lucille Williams
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Neerja Amin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Caitlin Parks
1W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Laurel Shambley
1W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.70
Heather Lautenbach
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Karen Strittmatter
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Kate Baynard
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristen Busby Icenhour
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Liz Cleghorn
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lucille Williams
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Neerja Amin
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.