Teams

Day Dreamers/OKC

2023 OKCAdult 40 & Over Day League · 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-30vs OKC DAY: No Strings AttachedLost 03
L#1 DoublesTina Stong / Chris Chamberlain vs Kara Hale / Alicia Towler0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTerrie Hanson vs Samantha Guffey6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCynthia Chapline / Sally Beckman vs Terri Ogle / JENNIE PRICE2-6, 0-6
2023-03-02vs Mixed Nuts/ECCLost 04
L#1 DoublesNancy Johnson / Amy High vs Lisa Robertson / Andrea Navarro1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKellea Park vs Kellie Beacham5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Mitchell / Sally Beckman vs Natalia Smith / Kim Lewis0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDee Hall / Diem Pham vs Debbie Bray / Teddi Roy2-6, 4-6
2022-10-20vs Volley Girls/ECCLost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy Johnson / Tina Stong vs Tammy Cole / Kalynn Kruse1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Stewart / Cynthia Chapline vs Ashley Shrader / Kourtney Aller0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesPeri Bennett / Terrie Hanson vs Alison Morris / Shelley Pappas5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-10-13vs Sweet Shots/OKCWon 21
W#1 DoublesChris Chamberlain / Julie Stewart vs Judy Schornick / Jennifer Wilson6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAmy High vs Glenda Radigonda7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDee Hall / Sally Beckman vs Jo Smith / Mari Jones4-6, 2-6
2022-09-29vs OKC DAY: No Strings AttachedLost 13
L#1 DoublesTerrie Hanson / Nancy Johnson vs Shawn O'Brien / Alicia Towler4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesNatica Smith vs Holly Ketchum6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Stewart / Cynthia Chapline vs Lisa Shaver / Laura Stewart2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Mitchell / Kellea Park vs Marie Lyons / Dawne Sullivan0-6, 0-6
2022-09-22vs Mixed Nuts/ECCLost 04
L#1 DoublesCynthia Chapline / Julie Stewart vs Debbie Bray / Teddi Roy0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesNatica Smith vs Kathryn Johnson4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPeri Bennett / Chris Chamberlain vs Lisa Robertson / Natalia Smith0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDee Hall / Diem Pham vs Heather Ross / Leigh Woody6-7, 3-6
2022-09-15vs Volley Girls/ECCLost 04
L#1 DoublesAmy High / Terrie Hanson vs Ashley Shrader / Kourtney Aller6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKellea Park vs Alison Morris6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChris Chamberlain / Kathy Hendrickson vs Shelley Pappas / Ashley Ritenour1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSally Beckman / Karen Mitchell vs Tammy Cole / Stacey Rigsby5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2022-09-08vs Sweet Shots/OKCLost 13
W#1 DoublesTina Stong / Nancy Johnson vs Jo Smith / Mari Jones6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAmy High vs Colleen Stevens2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Mitchell / Diem Pham vs Jenna Hellack / Michaele Benn0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSally Beckman / Dee Hall vs Kristi Nagode / Phyllis Reigh6-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OKC DAY: No Strings Attached8024821222
2Mixed Nuts/ECC5323924229
3Volley Girls/ECC53171535280
4Sweet Shots/OKC26112143293
5Day Dreamers/OKC0852758367

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Natica Smith
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.18
Amy High
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.03
Terrie Hanson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.87
Diem Pham
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.84
Tina Stong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Julie Stewart
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.56
Sally Beckman
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Chris Chamberlain
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Dee Hall
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kellea Park
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tina Stong + Sally Beckman3951% games+2.9% vs expected
Chris Chamberlain + Terrie Hanson3252% games−0.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natica Smith
59W–52L career · 2 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Amy High
64W–64L career · 8 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Terrie Hanson
95W–95L career · 4 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.03
3.5
Diem Pham
56W–87L career · 3 lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
2.87
Tina Stong
63W–81L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.84
Julie Stewart
16W–36L career · 4 lines in 2023
97%3%<1%
2.74
Sally Beckman
19W–65L career · 5 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
2.56
Chris Chamberlain
12W–23L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Dee Hall
0W–7L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kellea Park
19W–27L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.