Teams

Southside Bangers II

Spring Adult 18 & Over WeekEND · Men's 4.5 18s

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-10vs North Side Forehand Winner (NSFW)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRobert Williams / David Strong vs Trey Baring / Evan Hays6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-30vs Westwood 4.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesNicholas Cordes / Robert Williams vs Mark Werner / Berkley Simmons6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2022-06-12vs Four PointersWon 10
W#2 DoublesRobert Williams / Nicholas Cordes vs Antonio Cunha / Carlos Alcantara6-3, 7-5
2022-05-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Williams / Nicholas Cordes vs Christopher Lewis / David Thompson6-3, 6-2
2022-05-15vs AusTennisLost 01
L#2 DoublesNicholas Cordes / Robert Williams vs Larry Brumfield / Noah Rippner4-6, 4-6
2022-05-08vs Bad AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesRobert Williams / Zachary Arlen vs Scott Hudler / Donny Rogers5-7, 3-6
2022-04-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesChristian Sasam / Robert Williams vs Joseph Walters / Michael Tarsha6-3, 6-0
2022-04-10vs Wilco Warriors 4.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Williams / David Strong vs Oscar Martinez / Agustin Mena6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.5 18s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.26 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.58
Alex Hirt
published 5
4.40
Nicholas Cordes
published
4.39
David Strong
published 4.5
4.36
Sydney Merunka
published
4.30
Murilo Martins
published
Brian Randall
published 4.5
Robert Williams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.20
William Huntington
published
4.04
Gregory Hensley
published 4.5
3.84
Ed Pelaez
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicholas Cordes + David Strong6162% games+11.1% vs expected
Sydney Merunka + Robert Williams10061% games+4.1% vs expected
David Strong + William Huntington8652% games−4.6% vs expected
William Huntington + Robert Williams123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Alex Hirt
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
4.58
Nicholas Cordes
34W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
4.40
4.5
David Strong
28W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
4.39
Sydney Merunka
25W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
4.36
Murilo Martins
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Brian Randall
0W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Robert Williams
38W–9L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
William Huntington
22W–13L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Gregory Hensley
37W–34L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
4.04
Nicholas Wellinghoff
6W–24L career · no lines in 2022
89%11%<1%
3.84
4
Ed Pelaez
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.