Teams

Mishit Winners

2022 Baltimore Adult 18 & Over · Baltimore Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.57 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
L#1 DoublesRongfeng Li / Carlo Iomini vs Bradley Jacques / Joshua Sadler3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesGeorge Roberts / Kevin Foehrkolb vs Basil Aburn / Jeet Sandhu6-7, 5-7
2022-06-16vs Canadian Doubles National ChampionsSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMichael Apanius vs John Pirisino6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRongfeng Li / Kevin Foehrkolb vs Mark DiBiagio / Phineas Deford0-6, 1-6
2022-06-12vs Drop ShotsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichael Apanius / Gregg Eller vs Adam Daley / David Cadigan3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBrooks Thacker / Kevin Foehrkolb vs Stephen Phillips / Caleb Phillips6-3, 6-4
2022-06-05Won 10
W#2 SinglesMichael Apanius vs Adam Daley6-1, 7-6
2022-05-23Split 11
L#1 DoublesKevin Foehrkolb / Carlo Iomini vs Andrew Jordan / Brian Koch3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesMichael Apanius vs Eric Kruk6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDan Nordeen / Kevin Foehrkolb vs Michael Vanderputten / Basil Aburn3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRongfeng Li / Daniel Bryant vs Samuel Cook / Jim Slaughter6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2022-05-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesRongfeng Li / Daniel Bryant vs Paul Biser / Eric Kruk6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKevin Foehrkolb / Rongfeng Li vs John Doten / Jim Slaughter6-4, 6-3
2022-04-25Won 20
W#1 DoublesRongfeng Li / Carlo Iomini vs Nicolaus Wiegmann / Matthew Feild7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKevin Foehrkolb / Carlos Raul Jimenez vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesMichael Apanius / Brooks Thacker vs Michael Vanderputten / Jeet Sandhu4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Lerman / Kevin Foehrkolb vs Jim Slaughter / Samuel Cook4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Baltimore Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Michael Apanius
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published 4
3.51
Brooks Thacker
published 3.5
3.42
Daniel Bryant
published 3.5
Carlos Raul Jimenez
published 3.5
3.21
Kevin Foehrkolb
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.09
Rongfeng Li
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.07
Sean Balser
published
2.96
George Roberts
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Foehrkolb + Michael Apanius224 matchesnot enough data
Rongfeng Li + Kevin Foehrkolb123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Michael Apanius
74W–51L career · 13 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Brooks Thacker
13W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Daniel Bryant
27W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Carlos Raul Jimenez
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Kevin Foehrkolb
50W–90L career · 8 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Rongfeng Li
120W–164L career · 15 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
Sean Balser
4W–22L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
George Roberts
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.