Teams

NWW-AYTC-Osborn

2025 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Women

1 players · average NTRP 4.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alexandra van Hoy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
Results8 ties
2025-10-18Lost 01
L#2 DoublesQuinn Osborn / Alexandra van Hoy vs Christine Syvertson / Janelle Kotyk6-1, 6-2
2025-08-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesChristine Yang / Alexandra van Hoy vs MELISSA PISHION BOTTA / Gwendelyn Krause4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-06-15Won 10
W#2 DoublesChristine Yang / Alexandra van Hoy vs Nancy Rutter / Lauren Rutter7-5, 7-5
2025-05-17Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAlexandra van Hoy / Grace Bethards vs Lyna Nguyen / Gretchen Weaver6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-03Won 10
W#3 DoublesAlexandra van Hoy / Grace Bethards vs Annie Chechitelli / Jennifer McIntosh2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-27Won 10
W#3 DoublesAlexandra van Hoy / Jazmin Ahyat vs Qiya Yin / Whitney Garrett3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-13Won 10
W#3 DoublesAlexandra van Hoy / Christine Yang vs Gina la Porta / Jennifer McIntosh6-3, 6-2
2025-04-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesAlexandra van Hoy / Christine Yang vs Rachel Garton / Diane Tien7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Alexandra van Hoy
72W–56L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.