Teams

Friendly Combo Ladies

2025 Montgomery Combo Winter · Montgomery Combo Winter 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.12 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-07vs Honey Deuce 6.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRandi Goldrich / Yngrid Sierra vs Miki Reed / Kara Stegeman1-6, 4-6
2025-02-20vs WildcatsLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristin Wallace / Randi Goldrich vs Denise Levis / Natalie Watkins5-7, 3-6
2025-02-12vs Honey Deuce 6.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesYngrid Sierra / Alexandra Magdaleno vs Brenda Kaechele / Prashila Dullabh6-2, 6-4
2025-02-08vs break a stringLost 02
L#2 DoublesAngela Sharma / Randi Goldrich vs Anna-Karina Caudevilla / Denese Cavanaugh1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesYngrid Sierra / Nancy Pinto vs Suzanne Krudys / Elizabeth McLeod3-6, 3-6
2025-01-29vs WildcatsWon 10
W#3 DoublesYngrid Sierra / Angela Sharma vs Denise Levis / Cindy Pohoryles6-4, 7-6
2025-01-17vs break a stringLost 01
L#1 DoublesRandi Goldrich / Yngrid Sierra vs Regina Farrington / Lorena Alfaro3-6, 2-6
2025-01-12vs Get A Grip!Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLinda Shaffer / Randi Goldrich vs Gay Trinkner / Rebecca Clark7-6, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Combo Winter 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Kristin Wallace
published
3.24
Yvette Fontenot
published
3.20
3.20
Linda Shaffer
published
3.13
Yngrid Sierra
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.97
Wonok Kim
published
2.91
Angela Sharma
published 3
2.66
2.65
Nancy Pinto
published
2.56
Randi Goldrich
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Sharma + Linda Shaffer123 matchesnot enough data
Linda Shaffer + Wonok Kim123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Wallace
36W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Yvette Fontenot
17W–26L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Ruth Go Fernando Randle
21W–17L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Linda Shaffer
18W–17L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Yngrid Sierra
165W–231L career · 5 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.13
Wonok Kim
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Angela Sharma
57W–78L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Alexandra Magdaleno
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Nancy Pinto
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
3
Randi Goldrich
10W–38L career · 5 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.