Teams

West Team Blue

2026 Baltimore Combo Mixed · Baltimore Combo Mixed 6.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.21 / MARYLAND

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Baltimore Combo Mixed 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Brooks Thacker
published 3.5
3.39
Dan Albrecht
published 3.5
3.18
Angelica Kim
published 3.5
2.80
Jeffrey Richman
published
2.75
Dianna Sinofsky
published 3
Barry Laurent
published 3
2.68
Wendy Hubbert
published
2.66
Kimberly Sbarra
published 3
2.62
Jennifer Schied
published 3
2.55
Seema Iyer
published
2.52
Gail Lawson
published
2.49
Weiyang Liu
published
2.23
Jiashi Zhao
published
Joe Eisenberg
published
Michael West
published
Xing Zu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dianna Sinofsky + Jeffrey Richman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brooks Thacker
13W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Dan Albrecht
33W–32L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%22%
3.39
3.5
Angelica Kim
24W–19L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Jeffrey Richman
4W–8L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Dianna Sinofsky
43W–49L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Barry Laurent
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Wendy Hubbert
18W–41L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Kimberly Sbarra
53W–66L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Jennifer Schied
57W–126L career · no lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.62
Seema Iyer
3W–16L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Gail Lawson
2W–14L career · no lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
2.52
Weiyang Liu
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.49
Jiashi Zhao
12W–16L career · no lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
Joe Eisenberg
4W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael West
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Xing Zu
3W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.