Teams

JClarke (Queens)

2023 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 4.5 Men - Thurs PM

12 players · average NTRP 4.43 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-04-18vs BSmith (Park Road)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael de Amicis / Darnaye Black vs Trip Caldwell / Justin Hannon2-6, 3-6
2023-04-11vs MWaleski (Queens)Won 10
W#1 DoublesDarnaye Black / Peter Baker vs Ravi Mujumdar / Brian Morrow6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2023-03-09vs MGriffey (Weddington)Won 10
W#2 DoublesDarnaye Black / Peter Baker vs Scott Trapp / Robert Major6-3, 6-2
2023-02-23vs ABhargava (Lifetime)Won 10
W#3 DoublesDarnaye Black / Anthony Lasala vs Gary Johnson / Mario Gonzalez6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.5 Men - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Michael de Amicis
published 4.5
4.22
Omar Punjabi
published 4.5
4.18
Anthony Lasala
published 4
4.17
Andrew Schulz
published 4.5
4.16
Albert Cox
published 4.5
4.08
Darnaye Black
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.05
Anthony Duda
published 4.5
3.97
Peter Baker
published
3.91
Ross Painter
published
3.82
Joseph Clarke
published
3.73
Tim Chu
published
Bert Wilder
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Baker + Darnaye Black033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Michael de Amicis
11W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Omar Punjabi
66W–21L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
4.22
4
Anthony Lasala
35W–20L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%8%92%
4.18
4.5
Andrew Schulz
15W–23L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Albert Cox
1W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Darnaye Black
117W–60L career · 4 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
4.08
4.5
Anthony Duda
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
4.05
Peter Baker
12W–14L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
3.97
Ross Painter
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.91
Joseph Clarke
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.82
Tim Chu
12W–9L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Bert Wilder
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.