Teams

Davis Island - M. Dixon

2025 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-14vs Hills/Zantedeschi/40&Over4.5MLost 02
L#3 DoublesGreg Estroff / John Johnson vs John Williamson / Chris Ricketts1-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesBen Tucker / William Wymer vs Edwin Jagger / Matt Laccabue3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-06-07vs Buckhorn Nomads - J. TorresWon 20
W#2 DoublesJohn Johnson / Rogerio Bigio vs Manny Lopez / Amerigo Devera6-3, 6-0
W#4 DoublesGreg Estroff / Geoffrey Jones vs Mohamed Aboul-Ezz / Mohamed Khader6-0, 6-0
2025-05-17vs Hills/Zantedeschi/40&Over4.5MLost 12
W#1 DoublesGreg Estroff / John Johnson vs Craig Arndt / Sean Vickery6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBen Tucker / William Wymer vs Clark MacCullough / Zach Stubna6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#4 DoublesPeyton McLeod / Rogerio Bigio vs Matt Laccabue / Alejandro Mucino3-6, 3-6
2025-05-10vs Buckhorn Nomads - J. TorresWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichael Dixon / Rogerio Bigio vs Joshua McKinley / Hansil Kalaria6-3, 6-0
2025-04-26vs Hills/Zantedeschi/40&Over4.5MLost 02
L#2 DoublesWilliam Wymer / John Johnson vs Edwin Jagger / Matt Laccabue1-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesGreg Estroff / Geoffrey Jones vs Craig Arndt / Joseph Curtis3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-04-19vs Buckhorn Nomads - J. TorresWon 30
W#2 DoublesWilliam Zeedyk / Rogerio Bigio vs Vong Keovongsa / Amerigo Devera6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJustin Work / William Wymer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#4 DoublesMichael Dixon / Greg Estroff vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.26 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.53
Ben Tucker
published 4.5
4.38
Greg Estroff
usually #4 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.35
Ryan Gelhaus
published
Edward Peterson
published 4.5
4.23
Michael Dixon
published
4.20
Rogerio Bigio
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
4.15
Geoffrey Jones
published 4.5
4.13
William Wymer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.10
Peyton McLeod
published
Jeff Waite
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ben Tucker
8W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
4.53
4.5
Greg Estroff
31W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
4.38
Ryan Gelhaus
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
4.35
4.5
Edward Peterson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Dixon
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
Rogerio Bigio
32W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
4.20
4.5
Geoffrey Jones
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
4.15
William Wymer
14W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.13
Peyton McLeod
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
4.10
Jeff Waite
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.