Teams

Summer Sherman

2023 SUMMER 65&O Women · Summer 6.0W

14 players · average NTRP 2.75 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-21vs Summer EarlyLost 12
L#1 DoublesBeth DeVine / Karen Vaughn vs Marsha Friedli / Betsy Mauk3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesEileen Maher / Patricia Sherman vs Linda Augspurger / Diane Early3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Colter / Kaye Smith vs Kathy Breen / Gretchen Tomczak7-5, 6-2
2023-07-10vs Summer EarlyLost 12
W#1 DoublesPatricia Sherman / Eileen Maher vs Kathy Breen / Marsha Friedli6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Vaughn / Kaye Smith vs Sara Harris / Diane Holland1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJanet Plunkett / Karen Colter vs Betsy Mauk / Diana Kline5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2023-06-30vs Summer EarlyLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Keister / Vicki Linville vs Marsha Friedli / Diane Holland4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBeth DeVine / Karen Vaughn vs Kathy Breen / Linda Augspurger2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Colter / Melanie Williams-Tepley vs Ruth Crow / Betsy Mauk3-6, 1-6
2023-06-24vs Summer EarlyLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathleen Quinton / Patricia Sherman vs Diane Holland / Marsha Friedli2-6
L#2 DoublesDebbra Caughell / Janet Plunkett vs Linda Augspurger / Betsy Mauk1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Vaughn / Eileen Maher vs Deborah Ellis / Diana Kline3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-06-23vs Summer EarlyLost 02
L#1 DoublesEllen Berndt / Eileen Maher vs Kathy Breen / Diane Holland6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Colter / Kaye Smith vs Marsha Friedli / Sara Harris0-6, 4-6
2023-06-17vs Summer EarlyWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathleen Quinton / Patricia Sherman vs Linda Augspurger / Betsy Mauk6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMelanie Williams-Tepley / Barbara Zahm vs Marsha Friedli / Sara Harris1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Vaughn / Vicki Linville vs Ruth Crow / Diana Kline6-1, 6-0
2023-06-12vs Summer EarlyLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Keister / Ellen Berndt vs Diane Holland / Betsy Mauk7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanet Plunkett / Barbara Zahm vs Deborah Ellis / Diana Kline0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBeth DeVine / Kaye Smith vs Sara Harris / Ruth Crow3-6, 1-6
2023-05-19vs Summer EarlyLost 12
L#1 DoublesBeth DeVine / Karen Vaughn vs Kathy Breen / Diane Holland3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesEileen Maher / Patricia Sherman vs Deborah Ellis / Diana Kline6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesDebbra Caughell / Karen Colter vs Diane Early / Betsy Mauk3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Summer 6.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Summer Early7118617181
2Summer Sherman1761836250

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.13 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Eileen Maher
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Debbra Caughell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.13
Karen Vaughn
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Barbara Zahm
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Beth DeVine
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Ellen Berndt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Janet Plunkett
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Karen Colter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kathleen Quinton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kaye Smith
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Melanie Williams-Tepley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Patricia Sherman
published
Susan Keister
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Vicki Linville
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Vaughn + Patricia Sherman3449% games−3.1% vs expected
Karen Vaughn + Debbra Caughell0529% games−11.4% vs expected
Melanie Williams-Tepley + Debbra Caughell134 matchesnot enough data
Beth DeVine + Patricia Sherman044 matchesnot enough data
Karen Vaughn + Beth DeVine033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Eileen Maher
5W–20L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Debbra Caughell
48W–82L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen Vaughn
38W–128L career · 6 lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
2.13
Barbara Zahm
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Beth DeVine
3W–23L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ellen Berndt
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Janet Plunkett
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen Colter
17W–24L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathleen Quinton
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kaye Smith
3W–11L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Melanie Williams-Tepley
15W–46L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Patricia Sherman
40W–38L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Keister
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Vicki Linville
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.