Teams

Point Taken

2024 Montgomery Adult 18 & Over · Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

20 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-18vs Cosmic Strings 18Lost 01
L#2 SinglesLuci del Aguila vs Tamar Henkin2-6, 4-6
2024-05-29vs Break a String 3.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLynn Pendergast / Loan Nguyen vs Carrie McIntyre / Lisa Thomas7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLuci del Aguila vs Anjali Garg6-7, 2-6
2024-05-16vs JuanWon 20
W#2 DoublesLynn Pendergast / Shirley Hsieh-Lau vs Lemin Xiao / Rui Liu6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Boyd / Noelle Lynch vs Barbara Braffett / Jane Davenport6-2, 6-3
L#1 DoublesShirley Hsieh-Lau / Sanghee Lee vs Nicole Ifill / Sandy Thongphok2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLuci del Aguila vs Jelena Mitrovic1-6, 1-6
2024-04-28vs Break a String 3.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCecilia Kenary / Anabela Puhl vs Ruxandra Badiu / Carmen Scurato4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSarah Boyd / Noelle Lynch vs Lydia Juh / Zheng Dong6-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesShirley Hsieh-Lau vs Anjali Garg5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2024-04-22vs Lucky RackettesLost 02
L#1 SinglesLisa Means vs Lauren Chilton0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNoelle Lynch / Anabela Puhl vs Jennie Kim / Erin Newsome Moltz3-6, 4-6
2024-04-12vs The Young and the Rest of UsWon 20
W#1 DoublesLynn Pendergast / Loan Nguyen vs Anne Porto / Linda Shaffer6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnabela Puhl / Noelle Lynch vs Karlene Brathwaite / Kelsie Redburn6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-08vs LongshotsWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnne Christman / Lynn Pendergast vs Nikki Eyman / Elizabeth Hok5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShirley Hsieh-Lau / Luci del Aguila vs Carina Villagra / Janet Lin6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Sherry Altman
published
3.59
Robin Brille
published
3.50
Sanghee Lee
published
3.41
Paige Coulman
published
3.39
Anabela Puhl
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Shannon Golub
published
3.38
Penelope Bell
published
3.35
Marcella Trowern
published
3.34
Lisa Schneiderman
published
3.32
Lynn Pendergast
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Marie Israelite
published
3.26
Karoline Shannon
published
Anne Christman
published 3.5
Carrie Wofford
published 3.5
Noelle Lynch
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Luci del Aguila
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Shirley Hsieh-Lau
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.12
Li Ives
published
3.05
Cecilia Kenary
published 3.5
2.95
Lisa Means
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shirley Hsieh-Lau + Luci del Aguila41443% games−5.4% vs expected
Noelle Lynch + Anabela Puhl224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sherry Altman
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Robin Brille
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.59
Sanghee Lee
37W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.50
Paige Coulman
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Anabela Puhl
72W–45L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
Shannon Golub
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
79%21%<1%
3.39
Penelope Bell
18W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
Marcella Trowern
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
3.35
Lisa Schneiderman
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
3.34
3.5
Lynn Pendergast
36W–40L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Marie Israelite
11W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
Karoline Shannon
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Anne Christman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Carrie Wofford
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Noelle Lynch
55W–44L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Luci del Aguila
30W–66L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Shirley Hsieh-Lau
81W–131L career · 9 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
Li Ives
12W–34L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Cecilia Kenary
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Lisa Means
46W–131L career · 1 line in 2024
65%35%<1%
2.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.