Teams

Level Up-Gilmore/Coleman

2026 Fall Outdoor League-Saturday · 2.5W

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Liberty Park-En Fuego000000
2LP For the Love000000
3Level Up-Gilmore/Coleman000000
4CCC Slice Slice Baby000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.23 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.56
Rachael Gilmore
published
2.45
Stephanie Coleman
published
2.37
Linda Zhang
published
2.31
Aimee Carmer
published 2.5
2.26
Kim Sorenson
published
2.24
Bri Hernandez
published 2.5
2.10
Shalee Jenkins
published
2.08
Jade Alison Lim
published
2.08
Melanie McEntire
published
2.08
Neena Yoon
published
1.97
Marina Denton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Neena Yoon + Linda Zhang4257% games+14.6% vs expected
Neena Yoon + Marina Denton134 matchesnot enough data
Neena Yoon + Rachael Gilmore213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachael Gilmore
30W–10L career · no lines in 2026
0%33%67%
2.56
Stephanie Coleman
18W–18L career · no lines in 2026
0%63%37%
2.45
Linda Zhang
11W–5L career · no lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.37
2.5
Aimee Carmer
7W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.31
Kim Sorenson
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
2.5
Bri Hernandez
4W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Shalee Jenkins
8W–4L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Jade Alison Lim
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Melanie McEntire
0W–8L career · no lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.08
Neena Yoon
8W–18L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Marina Denton
3W–16L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.