Teams

LI - Carefree, Marks

2022 18&Over Men · 5.0

6 players · average NTRP / LONG ISLAND REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-01vs Robbie Wagner, SnowSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKeegan Morris / Michael Cornelius vs Jeffrey Snow / Daryl Weber4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLuis Vivas Martinez vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-19vs Robbie Wagner, SnowWon 10
W#1 SinglesMichael Cornelius vs Jeffrey Snow6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-07-19vs Robbie Wagner, SnowWon 20
W#1 DoublesJorge Gonzalez-Rubio / Keegan Morris vs Fabian Carchi / Jeffrey Snow6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMiguel Cobbs / Michael Cornelius vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-12vs Robbie Wagner, SnowWon 10
W#2 DoublesJonathan Bonnet / Ryan White vs Jeffrey Snow / Fabian Carchi6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-28vs Robbie Wagner, SnowWon 10
W#1 DoublesBen Marks / Luis Vivas Martinez vs Fabian Carchi / Jeffrey Snow6-3, 6-3
2022-06-21vs Robbie Wagner, SnowSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPete Siozios / Luis Vivas Martinez vs Jeffrey Snow / Jared Phillips7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKeegan Morris vs Daryl Weber6-3, 6-3
2022-06-14vs Robbie Wagner, SnowLost 01
L#1 DoublesLuis Vivas Martinez / Ryan White vs Fabian Carchi / Robert Principe1-6, 2-6
2022-05-24vs Robbie Wagner, SnowLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrew Chan / Jonathan Bonnet vs Fabian Carchi / Jeffrey Snow4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LI - Carefree, Marks0612615141
2Robbie Wagner, Snow0661225168

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.58 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.78
Michael Cornelius
usually #1 Doubles 30%, also #1 Singles 30% · published
4.39
Jonathan Bonnet
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Keegan Morris
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Luis Vivas Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Marcus Smith
published
Pete Siozios
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Cornelius
78W–46L career · 10 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
4.78
Jonathan Bonnet
15W–15L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
4.39
Keegan Morris
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Luis Vivas Martinez
48W–16L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Marcus Smith
10W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pete Siozios
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.