Teams

Greenhill/Lipshy-Oujezdsky W3.5

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Friday · W3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-26vs Lakewood/Cholerton-Carr W3.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesMargaret Cooley / Katherine Rader vs Kimberly Warren / Jacqueline Winslow6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJoanna Greenstone / Julie Sayah vs Claudia Magee / Lynn Robertson3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie King / Lori Stern vs Julie Davidson / Chrissy Kuo6-0, 6-3
2025-01-24vs Stonebridge/Cantu W3.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesStacia Durham / Katherine Rader vs Dawn Rochelle / Nicole Libby3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoanna Greenstone / Kelly Oujezdsky vs Beth Gatewood / Holly Kimm6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Friedman / Lori Stern vs Corrine Gregor / Karen Rudolph6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Lori Stern
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Margaret Cooley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Kelly Oujezdsky
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Julie Sayah
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Allison Singleton
published 3.5
3.32
Stephanie Friedman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Katherine Rader
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Jana Reist
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Joanna Greenstone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Stacia Durham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
2.92
Melissa Lipshy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Friedman + Julie Sayah6362% games+13.4% vs expected
Margaret Cooley + Katherine Rader7163% games+3.8% vs expected
Julie Sayah + Joanna Greenstone4249% games+3.7% vs expected
Joanna Greenstone + Lori Stern3260% gamesnot enough data
Margaret Cooley + Allison Singleton314 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Oujezdsky + Allison Singleton314 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Friedman + Lori Stern303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Stern
17W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.70
Margaret Cooley
41W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
Kelly Oujezdsky
20W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%22%
3.39
Julie Sayah
18W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Allison Singleton
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
Stephanie Friedman
13W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
Katherine Rader
21W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Jana Reist
24W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Joanna Greenstone
22W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Stacia Durham
11W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Francoise Moyes Carnal
11W–19L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Melissa Lipshy
3W–11L career · no lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.