Teams

Couvillion/18/2.5/M/BREC

2025 BR Adult 18 & Over - Men · 2.5 BR (18&O) Men

10 players · average NTRP 2.88 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-07vs Foreman/18/2.5/M/SOACWon 30
W#1 DoublesJeremy Couvillion / Caleb MacHa vs Roland Perault / Josh Wells6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCharles Bernhard vs Luke Blalock6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAndy Blouin / Sean Malone vs Josh Yankowsky / Matt Duplechain6-3, 6-2
2025-03-24vs Kandula/18/2.5/M/BRELost 12
W#1 DoublesCharles Bernhard / Jeremy Couvillion vs Alan Schroeder / Brent Landry6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMIKE ODEAY vs Qingyang Wang0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPatrick Colclough / Patrick Dooley vs Ben Jumonville / Shalin Sheth2-6, 1-6
2025-02-24vs Foreman/18/2.5/M/SOACWon 21
W#1 DoublesCharles Bernhard / Jeremy Couvillion vs Paul Berniard / Stephen McCulloh7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMIKE ODEAY vs Scott Bardwell0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAndy Blouin / Patrick Colclough vs Luke Blalock / Jonathan Menck6-3, 6-1
2025-02-17vs Kandula/18/2.5/M/BRELost 12
L#1 DoublesPatrick Dooley / Andy Blouin vs Ben Jumonville / Brent Landry5-7, 6-7
W#1 SinglesCharles Bernhard vs Qingyang Wang5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBubba Willis / Shawn Alford vs Prasanth Pasala / Richard Pham0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 BR (18&O) Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Charles Bernhard
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Andy Blouin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Caleb MacHa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.28
Patrick Dooley
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Bubba Willis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.94
MIKE ODEAY
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Jeremy Couvillion
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Patrick Colclough
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sean Malone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shawn Alford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Charles Bernhard
48W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.06
3
Andy Blouin
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Caleb MacHa
13W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Patrick Dooley
5W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.28
2.5
Bubba Willis
0W–4L career · type M · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
MIKE ODEAY
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.94
Jeremy Couvillion
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patrick Colclough
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sean Malone
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Shawn Alford
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.