Teams

JV Boys

2026 SETX Combo · MEN 8.5

5 players · average NTRP 4.25 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · MEN 8.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Target Practice000000
2JV Boys000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Daniel Duplechin
published 4.5
3.85
Craig Fox
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.84
Joseph Lovinggood
published
3.77
Madison Bond
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Justin Lu
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daniel Duplechin
27W–0L career · no lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
4.36
4
Craig Fox
30W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.85
Joseph Lovinggood
12W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.84
Madison Bond
22W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
Justin Lu
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.