Teams

Busch 40+ 3.0W Singles Mon PM

2025 Piedmont Singles 40+ · 3.0 Women Singles Mon PM

5 players · average NTRP / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-28vs Johnson 40+ 3.0W Singles Mon PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesJennifer Ayers vs Debbie Johnson1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesKathleen Mooney vs Ginger Ballard1-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesTara Rusiewicz vs Rebecca Sheppard1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesTara Rusiewicz vs Cozetta Gaines6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesLiz Busch vs Carrie Kerby1-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesRachel Summerlee vs Pamela Banister6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-07-07vs Johnson 40+ 3.0W Singles Mon PMWon 21
W#1 SinglesKathleen Mooney vs Diane Puckett6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesLiz Busch vs Rebecca Sheppard3-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesJennifer Ayers vs Courtney OShea6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJennifer Ayers vs Sharlotte Brooks1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTara Rusiewicz vs Louise Albright3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesLiz Busch vs Emily Owen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKathleen Mooney vs Megan Ray6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesRachel Summerlee vs Allison Chisholm1-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesLiz Busch vs Sarah Lopatka6-3, 6-0
2025-06-16vs Johnson 40+ 3.0W Singles Mon PMLost 12
L#1 SinglesKathleen Mooney vs Ginger Ballard0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesTara Rusiewicz vs Tracey Grayzer7-5, 6-3
L#3 SinglesRachel Summerlee vs Courtney OShea1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesLiz Busch vs Radha Singh1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesKathleen Mooney vs Louise Albright6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesJennifer Ayers vs LoriAnn Owen6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKathleen Mooney vs Megan Ray6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesTara Rusiewicz vs Allyson Wood6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesJennifer Ayers vs Pamela Banister6-0, 6-0
2025-05-19vs Singh/ARSC 40+ 3.0W Singles Mon PMLost 12
L#1 SinglesKathleen Mooney vs Radha Singh6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJennifer Ayers vs Sharlotte Brooks6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesTara Rusiewicz vs Louise Albright6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Singles Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Kathleen Mooney
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
2.90
Jennifer Ayers
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.86
Tara Rusiewicz
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.76
Liz Busch
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.28
Rachel Summerlee
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Mooney + Jennifer Ayers5063% games+12.7% vs expected
Liz Busch + Tara Rusiewicz7652% games+8.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen Mooney
29W–12L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
Jennifer Ayers
37W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Tara Rusiewicz
23W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.86
Liz Busch
22W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
Rachel Summerlee
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.