Teams

Payne Park Avery

2023 Sarasota Adult 18 & Over Spring Weekend · 3.0 W Saturday

9 players · average NTRP 3.30 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-03vs Sarasota/Ross/18&Over3.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesGillian Kaye / Bev Murray vs Alina Fotache / Claire Virtue6-7, 5-6
L#1 SinglesThao Ross vs Lisa Pyser1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPatty Avery / Rebecca Zion vs Cyndi Weitzel / Zora Trujic6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2023-05-13vs SSC GrossmanWon 20
W#1 DoublesPatty Avery / Bev Murray vs Kate Khaleel / Laurie Coleman6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesThao Ross vs Lauren Burkle6-1, 6-0
2023-05-06vs Sarasota/Ross/18&Over3.0WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPatty Avery / Rebecca Zion vs Lisa Pyser / Zora Trujic3-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesThao Ross vs Trisha Moslin3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-04-22vs SSC GrossmanWon 21
L#1 DoublesSony Martinez / Rebecca Zion vs Lynette Fritz / Margaret Capodice6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesThao Ross vs Mary Scott6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBarbara Peterson / Bev Murray vs Kate Khaleel / Gayle Hassle7-5, 6-0
2023-04-15vs Sarasota/Ross/18&Over3.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesPatty Avery / Bev Murray vs Monica Barth / Cyndi Weitzel2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesThao Ross vs Jacqueline Moore6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-04-01vs SSC GrossmanWon 20
W#1 DoublesRebecca Zion / Sony Martinez vs Laurie Coleman / Kate Khaleel6-0, 6-4
W#2 SinglesThao Ross vs Lauren Burkle6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Bev Murray
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.36
Rebecca Zion
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Thao Ross
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Patty Avery
published
2.96
Pamela Huelster
published
2.81
Justine Amdur
published
2.71
Gillian Kaye
published 3
2.52
Ann Hollins
published 3
2.43
Sony Martinez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bev Murray + Rebecca Zion12464% games+1.7% vs expected
Thao Ross + Bev Murray10557% games+1.5% vs expected
Thao Ross + Rebecca Zion8360% games+0.1% vs expected
Patty Avery + Gillian Kaye314 matchesnot enough data
Patty Avery + Rebecca Zion303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bev Murray
71W–40L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Rebecca Zion
67W–41L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Thao Ross
73W–54L career · 6 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Patty Avery
14W–16L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
Pamela Huelster
12W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
2.96
Justine Amdur
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Gillian Kaye
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Ann Hollins
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
2.52
Sony Martinez
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.