Teams

SKrenz (Pine Lake)

2024 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-08-21vs MOlsen (Blakeney)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesBeth Hanrahan / Lydia Schoeck vs Kristin Bergeson / Deepti Dua4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAllison Moseley / Lauren Stikeleather vs Michelle Ludwiczak / Maria del Mar Vazquez2-6, 1-6
2024-08-14vs ASunden (Raintree)Won 10
W#1 DoublesLydia Schoeck / Karen Holbrook vs Alyson Sunden / Stacy Andrews6-3, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Lydia Schoeck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.50
Sarah Krenz
published
3.19
Allison Moseley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Ashle Basden
published 3.5
2.69
Beth Barnes
published 3
2.64
Gayle Hoy
published
2.40
Karen Holbrook
published
Gretchen Pfeiffer
published
Kathleen Ramsey
published
Lauren Stikeleather
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Moseley + Lydia Schoeck13656% games+3.0% vs expected
Karen Holbrook + Gayle Hoy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lydia Schoeck
103W–69L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.61
Sarah Krenz
4W–10L career · no lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Allison Moseley
52W–69L career · 1 line in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Ashle Basden
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Beth Barnes
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
Gayle Hoy
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
2.64
Karen Holbrook
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
75%25%<1%
2.40
Gretchen Pfeiffer
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathleen Ramsey
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lauren Stikeleather
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.