Teams

B11 ACAC Carter

2023 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 7.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.83 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-11-26vs B6 MRTC Williams / JonesLost 01
L#1 DoublesRandolph Moore / Liesl Delisio vs Collin Ward / Missy Poccia5-7, 6-7
2023-11-18vs B9 Willow Oaks DuntonWon 10
W#1 DoublesStone Smith / Liesl Delisio vs Laura Vetter / Ben Barbour6-2, 7-6
2023-11-05vs B5 MTC Marks Miracles MixedWon 10
W#1 DoublesLiesl Delisio / Stone Smith vs Pamela Stidham / Christopher Stidham7-6, 6-2
2023-11-04vs B8 MAC Talamo 7.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLiesl Delisio / Jeffrey Foddrell vs Tanisha Moseley / Kevin Cousins6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-10-29Won 10
W#3 DoublesMark Carter / Sandra Holahan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-10-22vs B1 ACAC Davis C.C. CrushersWon 10
W#1 DoublesLiesl Delisio / Jeffrey Foddrell vs Bert Teachey / Anne Bane7-5, 6-2
L#1 DoublesLiesl Delisio / Jeffrey Foddrell vs Kelly Stalls / Jesse Smith6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-09-10vs B2 Westwood CecilLost 01
L#3 DoublesSandra Holahan / Stone Smith vs Megan Alwine / James Mullahy1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Ryan Traylor
published
3.67
Craik Goodspeed
published 4
3.64
Liesl Delisio
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.59
Lee Moore
published
3.30
Stone Smith
published
3.29
Jeffrey Foddrell
published
3.29
Virginia Nelson
published
3.26
Judy Napier
published
3.23
Randolph Moore
published
3.21
Linda Larue
published
3.10
Sandra Holahan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Mark Carter
published
Steven Larue
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryan Traylor
7W–12L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Craik Goodspeed
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Liesl Delisio
197W–163L career · 11 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.64
Lee Moore
18W–16L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.59
Stone Smith
12W–17L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Jeffrey Foddrell
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
Virginia Nelson
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
Judy Napier
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
Randolph Moore
22W–26L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Linda Larue
18W–17L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Sandra Holahan
59W–94L career · 2 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
Mark Carter
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Steven Larue
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.