Teams

Stefanie Kreiger - 3.5 (Tennis Central)

2022 Flex Singles League - Women (16 · 91)

1 player · average NTRP / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 SinglesStefanie Kreiger vs Laurie Hoffman1-6, 1-6
2022-07-09vs Jamie Behr - 3.5 (Chelsea Piers)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesStefanie Kreiger vs Jamie Behr2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesStefanie Kreiger vs Mari Inagami7-6, 4-3
2022-06-12vs Michele Even - 3.5 (Intensity)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesStefanie Kreiger vs Michele Even3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesStefanie Kreiger vs Mari Inagami3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesStefanie Kreiger vs Laurie Hoffman2-6, 1-6
2022-05-07vs Michele Even - 3.5 (Intensity)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesStefanie Kreiger vs Michele Even6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings29 teams · 91)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Adrienne Betz - 3.5 (Tennis Central)000000
2WD - Dani Crooker -3.5 (Four Seasons Racquet Club)000000
3Yoanna Franchini - 3.5 (Tennis Club of Trumbull)011019
4Jackie Donnelly - 3.5 (Edgewood Bath & Tennis Club022019
5Julie Cochran - 3.5 (Fairfield Indoor Tennis)0211113
6Alexandra Cabral- 3.5 (Edgewood Bath & Tennis Club0211321
7Liesl Purviance - 3.5 (Milford Indoor Tennis)0211319
8Dale Norton - 3.5 (Tennis Central)0321326
9Carita Kurth - 3.5 (Four Seasons Racquet Club)0303635
10Junjira Sookvaree - 3.5 (Tennis Central)0422534
11Trudie Gubitz - 3.5 (Fairfield Indoor Tennis)0413741
12Mina Kim - 3.5 (Edgewood Bath & Tennis Club)0413745
13Ana Murray - 3.5 (Middlebury Racquet Club)0541329
14Jamie Behr - 3.5 (Chelsea Piers)0541441
15Michele Even - 3.5 (Intensity)0532649
16Elizabeth Jaykus - 3.5 (Weston Racquet Club)0523753
17Dara Lieberson - 3.5 (Weston Racquet Club)0523851
18Jill Guzzetti - 3.5 (King's Highway Tennis Club)05051060
19Laurie Hoffman - 3.5 (Solaris Racquet Club)0660127
20Sandra Rose - 3.5 (Solaris Racquet Club)0624962
21Charlotte Allen - 3.5 (New Canaan Racquet Club)0770030
22Virginia Maher - 3.5 (Solaris Racquet Club)0761350
23Sandra Frost - 3.5 (Fairfield Indoor Tennis)0761447
24Shannon Roper - 3.5 (Fairfield Indoor Tennis0752539
25Stefanie Kreiger - 3.5 (Tennis Central)07161275
26Mari Inagami - 3.5 (Four Seasons Racquet Club)07161380
27Monica Young - 3.5 (New Canaan Racquet Club)0844964
28Kim Bandak - 3.5 (Edgewood Bath & Tennis Club)092714103
29Jennifer Amadeo - 3.5 (Four Seasons Racquet Club)0102818113

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Stefanie Kreiger
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stefanie Kreiger
115W–108L career · 7 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.