Teams

Manning/Soapes/Nashville

2026 Adult 55 & Over - Nashville · 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-03vs Yung-Okamoto/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnn Manning / Beverly Soapes vs Ann Frantz / Julie Burnstein1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMelinda Neely / Barbara Tempkins vs Leena Choi / Caroline Browder7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTina Hall / Dianna Spurlock vs Pat Yung-Okamoto / Sally Goodrich4-6, 2-6
2026-04-19vs Webb/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesStephanie Kinard / Lisa Lowe vs Donna Cox / Ellen Gooden1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Tempkins / Barbara Parker vs Jennifer Frank / Orly Cohen5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnn Manning / Beverly Soapes vs Cristin Webb / Heidi Kemp6-3, 6-1
2026-04-12vs Yung-Okamoto/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesBarbara Tempkins / Susan Steger vs Frances Martin / LIsa Robinson1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Parker / Evelyn Doxey vs Susan Feazel / Julie Hatcher3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBeverly Soapes / Tina Hall vs Ann Frantz / Julie Burnstein3-6, 1-6
2026-03-22vs Webb/NashvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnn Manning / Dianna Spurlock vs Tammy Shrivalle / Patricia Frawley1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Kinard / Renee Waggoner vs Jennifer Frank / Lori Breaux6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesEvelyn Doxey / Barbara Parker vs Orly Cohen / Courtney Edwards6-1, 6-3
2026-03-15vs Webb/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelinda Neely / Renee Waggoner vs Michelle Deng / Donna Cox1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTina Hall / Lisa Lowe vs Tammy Shrivalle / Patricia Frawley2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAnn Manning / Beverly Soapes vs Jennifer Frank / Courtney Edwards1-6, 3-6
2026-03-08vs Yung-Okamoto/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesBeverly Soapes / Evelyn Doxey vs Leena Choi / LIsa Robinson5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Parker / Susan Steger vs Frances Martin / Kathleen Malchow4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesStephanie Kinard / Pamela Hicks vs Sally Goodrich / Julie Carpenter0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Yung-Okamoto/Nashville60153699
2Simoneaux/Byrd/Nashville6216820206
3Todesco/Nashville53141026203
4Manning/Soapes/Nashville1541428193
5McRae/Nashville1751941264

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Evelyn Doxey
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Susan Steger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Barbara Tempkins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Pamela Hicks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Tina Hall
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Barbara Parker
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Dianna Spurlock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.05
Beverly Soapes
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.86
Stephanie Kinard
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Melinda Neely
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Renee Waggoner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Evelyn Doxey
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
Susan Steger
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.36
3.5
Barbara Tempkins
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Pamela Hicks
29W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Tina Hall
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.19
3.5
Barbara Parker
17W–37L career · 4 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Dianna Spurlock
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Beverly Soapes
3W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
Stephanie Kinard
10W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
Melinda Neely
3W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Renee Waggoner
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.