Teams

Country Club of Birmingham - Pickering

2025 B'ham Spring - 55 & Over Weekday Women, 1:30 pm · 4.0 Women Monday (Partial Round Robin)

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-28vs GS YMCA - Christen 55s Spring 25Won 30
W#1 DoublesPaula Henry / Catherine Harvey vs Tracy Christen / Tammy McClure3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLavonda Keel / Margaret Troiano vs Donna Christie / Susan Koslin2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMeg Sullivan / Jill Clark vs Frances Mulkin / Audrey Oyama7-5, 6-2
2025-04-03vs Pinetree CC - KirkSplit 11
L#1 DoublesIsabelle Lawson / Nancy Watson vs Miller Middlebrook / Anne Gauld4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBeth Welden / Jennifer Beall vs Lisa Kirk / Julie Weinacker6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-17vs Highland Park - SheaLost 12
L#1 DoublesPaula Henry / Isabelle Lawson vs Angela Chandler / Elizabeth Daly2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMargaret Troiano / Dot Nall vs Lacy Sparks / Nancy Klopman4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Watson / Lavonda Keel vs Pamela Coggin / Mary Flach0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-03-10vs PRC - Roberts-55Lost 12
L#1 DoublesIsabelle Lawson / Beth Welden vs Lee Hughes / Virginia Caris1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDot Nall / Lavonda Keel vs Edithe Ashworth / Suzanne Sevin4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJill Clark / Meg Sullivan vs Lisa Roberts / Laura Partain6-2, 0-6, 1-0
2025-03-03vs TRC - McNeal/MosleyWon 21
W#1 DoublesCatherine Harvey / Isabelle Lawson vs Cheryl Morrow / Randa Mosley3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Beall / Beth Welden vs Mellony Mc Neal / Ywonna Whatley1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLavonda Keel / Meg Sullivan vs Sandy Pilant / Cathy Scheer6-1, 6-3
2025-02-24vs LTF - CHUNN 2025Lost 03
L#1 DoublesPaula Henry / Margaret Troiano vs Lisa Shelby / Meredith Vinson7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDot Nall / Nancy Watson vs Kim Chunn / Deana Washburn0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJill Clark / Mary Kay Pickering vs Susie Gilbreath / Johanne Rosene3-6, 0-6
2025-02-17vs BHRC - Rinks Spring 2025Won 21
L#1 DoublesCatherine Harvey / Adelaide Vandevelde vs Julia Rinks / Sharon Travis6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Beall / Beth Welden vs Lisa Foster / Kelly Sullivan1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMeg Sullivan / Jill Clark vs Katie Rosenberg / Lisa McClure6-1, 6-1
2025-02-10vs BH - ErnestLost 03
L#1 DoublesPaula Henry / Isabelle Lawson vs Donna Gordon / Tina Mills3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDot Nall / Nancy Watson vs Barbara Ernest / Catherine Ellis2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMargaret Troiano / Mary Kay Pickering vs Shelia Walker / Jenny Kimel3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women Monday (Partial Round Robin) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Meg Sullivan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Adelaide Vandevelde
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Catherine Harvey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Lavonda Keel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.62
Paula Henry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Margaret Troiano
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.51
Isabelle Lawson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Jennifer Beall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Beth Welden
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.35
Mary Kay Pickering
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Dot Nall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meg Sullivan + Isabelle Lawson1438% games−16.9% vs expected
Paula Henry + Catherine Harvey3242% games−17.1% vs expected
Beth Welden + Jennifer Beall3343% gamesnot enough data
Mary Kay Pickering + Dot Nall033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meg Sullivan
8W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Adelaide Vandevelde
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Catherine Harvey
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Lavonda Keel
4W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.65
Paula Henry
5W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Margaret Troiano
2W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
Isabelle Lawson
5W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.51
Jennifer Beall
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
Beth Welden
3W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Mary Kay Pickering
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
3.35
Dot Nall
3W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.