Teams

Kanawha Gerecke

2024 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 7.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.83 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-23vs ACAC Naylor Mixed 7.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCasey Hill / Katherine Fleck vs Julie Ruth / John Delisio1-6, 1-6
2024-11-16vs Avalon GhitaWon 10
W#2 DoublesLauren Hauk / Brian Hauk vs Thomas Leftwich / Jordan Harper6-1, 6-4
2024-11-02vs Westwood HauseLost 02
L#2 DoublesLauren Hauk / Brian Hauk vs Kristy Seredni / Ian Webster3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTyler Watkins / Katie Gerecke vs Liza Hause / Wes Valentine5-7, 6-7
2024-10-26vs MAC Mixed Troubles - CousinsWon 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Turner / Katherine Fleck vs Lyman Brown / Kimberly Livingston3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-20Won 20
W#2 DoublesLauren Hauk / Brian Hauk vs John Kim / Elizabeth Hoover7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKatie Gerecke / Tyler Watkins vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Lauren Hauk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.02
Melissa Rhoades
published
3.81
Robert Turner
published
3.75
Chris Gerecke
published 4
3.70
Katy Holder
published
3.61
Katie Gerecke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Brian Hauk
published 3.5
3.33
Casey Hill
published 3.5
3.31
Katherine Fleck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Robert Teele
published
3.12
Annie Turner
published 3.5
2.96
Kindra Kirkeby
published
Emily Edens
published
Karl Kirkeby
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Hauk + Brian Hauk4152% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Lauren Hauk
67W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.24
Melissa Rhoades
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
43%56%<1%
4.02
Robert Turner
14W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Chris Gerecke
13W–10L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Katy Holder
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Katie Gerecke
109W–125L career · 2 lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Brian Hauk
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Casey Hill
19W–19L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
Katherine Fleck
64W–60L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Robert Teele
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Annie Turner
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.12
Kindra Kirkeby
15W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
2.96
Emily Edens
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karl Kirkeby
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.