Teams

LLW - Bake- Glam Slam Queens

2022 Adult 18 & Over - Bakersfield · Women's 3.5 - Bake

15 players · average NTRP 3.64 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-06-05vs Bake - Holliday HittersWon 20
W#1 SinglesLauren Eittreim vs Michelle Pisano6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBriana Starr / Edyta Grant vs Linette Holliday / Susan Frakes7-6, 6-2
2022-05-01vs Bake - Holliday HittersWon 10
W#2 DoublesLauren Eittreim / Dawn Rhodes vs Cheyenne Romanini / Michelle Pisano3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-24Won 10
W#2 SinglesLauren Eittreim vs Susan Byers6-2, 6-0
2022-04-10Won 20
W#2 DoublesEdyta Grant / Briana Starr vs Angela Echeverria / Janet Bell6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesLauren Eittreim vs Susan Byers3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-03-27Won 10
W#3 DoublesHeather Blue / Lauren Eittreim vs Peggy LEAPLEY / Janet Bell6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 - Bake have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Briana Starr
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.66
Lauren Eittreim
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.46
Kim Horton
published
3.33
Edyta Grant
published 3.5
Dawn Rhodes
published 3.5
3.23
Diane Bashirtash
published 3.5
3.21
Erika Gatson
published 3.5
3.13
Sandra Gamboa
published
3.12
Crystal Neptune
published 3.5
3.11
Rebecca Badgett
published
3.08
Krista Rodriguez
published
3.04
Nahla Tamer
published
Rosemarie Galindo
published
Samantha Pankey
published
Terry Echeverria
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Briana Starr + Lauren Eittreim33365% games+9.3% vs expected
Rebecca Badgett + Sandra Gamboa3249% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Briana Starr
70W–12L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.90
4
Lauren Eittreim
57W–11L career · 5 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.66
Kim Horton
22W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Edyta Grant
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Dawn Rhodes
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Diane Bashirtash
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Erika Gatson
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Sandra Gamboa
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Crystal Neptune
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.12
Rebecca Badgett
10W–13L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Krista Rodriguez
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Nahla Tamer
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
Rosemarie Galindo
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Samantha Pankey
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Terry Echeverria
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.