Teams

Curley, Michael

2025 Adult 40 & Over 3.0 - 5.0 - Weekend · 3.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-08vs HOA/Burgess/40&over3.5MLost 04
L#1 DoublesJon Hermach / Brian Lint vs Richard Bierman / Vinny Pires4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesClay UHRMACHER vs Robert Halksworth0-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesShashi Gannavaram / Carl Moeller vs Jeff Myers / Andrew Plungkhen2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDanny Hooks / DANNY BANDERAS vs Marc Morris / Jerry Martin3-6, 0-6
2025-01-04vs Schmitz, NeilSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBill Roller / Marc Richard vs Jonathan Blachly / Neil Schmitz3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesClay UHRMACHER vs Joel Fagin4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBrian Lint / Carl Moeller vs Juan Carlos Baldelomar / John Murry7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDanny Hooks / Shashi Gannavaram vs Jeff Hargroves / Jeffrey Cram3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Clay UHRMACHER
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
DANNY BANDERAS
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Avery Woodard
published 3.5
3.21
Carl Moeller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Brian Lint
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Bill Roller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Shashi Gannavaram
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Michael Curley
published
2.80
Charles Thomas
published 3
Danny Hooks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jon Hermach
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Marc Richard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Thomas + Michael Curley044 matchesnot enough data
Charles Thomas + Avery Woodard033 matchesnot enough data
Charles Thomas + DANNY BANDERAS123 matchesnot enough data
Avery Woodard + Carl Moeller123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Clay UHRMACHER
22W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
DANNY BANDERAS
14W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Avery Woodard
38W–77L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Carl Moeller
6W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Brian Lint
13W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Bill Roller
23W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
Shashi Gannavaram
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.08
Michael Curley
13W–25L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Charles Thomas
3W–21L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.80
3
Danny Hooks
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jon Hermach
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Marc Richard
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.