Teams

KTC Aguilera

2025 OH OV FALL A18&O Weekend · Fall 4.0 Men Dayton

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-01-05vs KTC ComptonLost 13
W#1 DoublesMichael Budde / Bart Grunenwald vs Jim Minard / Joe Wood2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNicholas Quiroz vs Chris Compton1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRyan Snyder / Avery Walton vs Gary Konnert / Roy Stevens4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSamuel Garay vs GOBINATH BALASUBRAMANIAN6-0, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall 4.0 Men Dayton have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Nicholas Quiroz
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.83
Ryan Maurer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Samuel Garay
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Bart Grunenwald
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Matthew Cary
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
Jacob Loeffelholz
published
3.31
Rodolfo Aguilera
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Avery Walton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Donald Nguyen
published
Matt Cho
published
Michael Budde
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Paul Hodge
published
Ryan Snyder
published
Scott Dooley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Budde + Matthew Cary4355% games−2.6% vs expected
Jacob Loeffelholz + Rodolfo Aguilera404 matchesnot enough data
Michael Budde + Rodolfo Aguilera224 matchesnot enough data
Matt Cho + Matthew Cary314 matchesnot enough data
Rodolfo Aguilera + Matthew Cary123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicholas Quiroz
75W–32L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.98
Ryan Maurer
94W–35L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.83
Samuel Garay
37W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Bart Grunenwald
24W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Matthew Cary
59W–62L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Jacob Loeffelholz
47W–32L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.44
Rodolfo Aguilera
121W–49L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Avery Walton
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Donald Nguyen
33W–36L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Matt Cho
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Budde
42W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Paul Hodge
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Snyder
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Dooley
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.