Teams

CC of WH - B. Merritt

2024 Polk Adult 18 & Over - Women · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-27vs City of Winter Haven - J. EdwardsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLeah Carrerou / Terree Meyers vs Hilda Franco / Heather Cain6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMeghan Savant vs Elizabeth Provenzano4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-03-20vs Beerman TNT - T. ChoeLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Merritt / Monica Trujillo vs Tiffany Love / Karola Cordero6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichaela Hillenbrand / Terree Meyers vs Catherine Mueller / Leslie Simmons6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJan Hyman / Sandy Ramsey vs Teresa Osborn / Kimberly Funk1-6, 3-6
2024-03-06vs Polk/Spann/18&Over3.5WSplit 22
W#1 DoublesTerree Meyers / Hannah Taylor vs Nathaly Arredondo / Ratnamani Lingamallu3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Burns / Michaela Hillenbrand vs Bettye Sykes / Cynthia Hallock6-3, 7-6
L#2 SinglesMeghan Savant vs Jennifer Spann0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesHeather Bogdahn / Monica Trujillo vs Kacee Swain / Jennifer Rogers2-6, 3-6
2024-02-28vs LCC WidickLost 12
L#1 DoublesHeather Bogdahn / Leah Carrerou vs Joan Baldava / Tracy Achinger2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMeghan Savant vs Lauren Clark4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Merritt / Jennifer Burns vs Robin Sussingham / Kimberly Elmhorst6-4, 6-2
2024-02-14vs City of Winter Haven - J. EdwardsWon 21
L#1 DoublesLeah Carrerou / Terree Meyers vs Melanie Langley / Anna Previte3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesMeghan Savant vs Melanie Johnson6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Merritt / Jan Hyman vs Laurie Grieger / Hilda Franco6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-02-07vs Beerman TNT - T. ChoeWon 30
W#1 DoublesMeghan Savant / Michaela Hillenbrand vs Tiffany Choe / Angela Johnson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMonica Trujillo / Heather Bogdahn vs Leslie Simmons / Tiffany Love6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLeah Carrerou / Terree Meyers vs Wendi Wood / Danielle Adkins6-3, 6-0
2024-01-31vs Polk/Spann/18&Over3.5WWon 21
W#1 SinglesMeghan Savant vs Ratnamani Lingamallu6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLeah Carrerou / Brittany Ward vs Amanda Smith / Kacee Swain2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Burns / Michaela Hillenbrand vs Bettye Sykes / Kara Reber6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2024-01-24vs LCC WidickLost 03
L#1 SinglesMeghan Savant vs Holly Daniels2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTerree Meyers / Monica Trujillo vs Maya Beck / Tracy Achinger1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJan Hyman / Sandy Ramsey vs Tiffany Osler Kilpatrick / Kerrie Hall3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
3.33
Meghan Savant
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
Brittany Ward
published 3.5
3.25
Monica Trujillo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Elizabeth Merritt
published 3.5
3.17
Sandy Ramsey
published
3.14
Victoria Karen
published
3.13
Catie Kincaid
published 3.5
3.10
Leah Carrerou
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.10
Jennifer Burns
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Hannah Taylor
published 3
2.91
Terree Meyers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.73
Holly Worrell
published 3
2.62
Jan Hyman
usually #3 Doubles 88%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terree Meyers + Monica Trujillo9748% games+8.8% vs expected
Jennifer Burns + Meghan Savant14858% games+6.2% vs expected
Leah Carrerou + Monica Trujillo241353% games+3.5% vs expected
Leah Carrerou + Terree Meyers182345% games−6.9% vs expected
Jan Hyman + Terree Meyers044 matchesnot enough data
Leah Carrerou + Sandy Ramsey123 matchesnot enough data
Leah Carrerou + Elizabeth Merritt033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michaela Hillenbrand
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
3.45
3.5
Meghan Savant
82W–39L career · 14 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Brittany Ward
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Monica Trujillo
105W–82L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.25
3.5
Elizabeth Merritt
2W–13L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
Sandy Ramsey
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.17
Victoria Karen
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Catie Kincaid
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%<1%
3.13
Leah Carrerou
87W–95L career · 5 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Jennifer Burns
89W–64L career · 3 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Hannah Taylor
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
2.96
Terree Meyers
53W–86L career · 6 lines in 2024
75%25%<1%
2.91
3
Holly Worrell
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
Jan Hyman
66W–86L career · 8 lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.